The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
Answer:
describes the section of a state government that makes the laws.
<span>C. Farmers have not been able to find ways to use water for irrigation</span>
Exchange of domestic goods within the boundaries of a country
Answer;populist i just got it right
Explanation:
