1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivann1987 [24]
2 years ago
9

A critical part of adolescence is identity formation. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F

History
2 answers:
Alex787 [66]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Answer  is True

Explanation:

A critical part of adolescence is identity formation. Research indicates that individuals experience less moratorium and achievement as age increases. Every person will eventually reach identity achievement in all aspects of their identity.

Kazeer [188]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

lol very much true XD

Explanation:

You might be interested in
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the best definition of a “blitzkrieg”?
poizon [28]
I think it’s rapid invasion by air and land .
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did industrialization negatively impact americans pleaseeeee helpppp
Ivan

Answer:

Industrialization also had a major impact on the lives of women and children. ... And the last major group of people that suffered from industrialization were the Native Americans. As the railroad use became more common, many people moved westward and destroyed the Native American homes.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What were the cases of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worchester v. Georgia (tell what happened in each case)? How do the cases
Semenov [28]
<span>By refusing to consider Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), the Supreme Court denied self-government to a Native American tribe. Prior to 1831, the federal government treated tribes as foreign entities in conducting official interactions with them. In an effort to keep their tribal lands, the Cherokee living within Georgia turned to farming and ranching. They also wrote a constitution and laws reflecting some aspects of U.S. law. The state of Georgia declared all the Cherokee laws void, prompting that nation to appeal to the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the opinion dismissing the case, saying that Indian tribes were "domestic dependent nations" and could not turn to the Supreme Court. The case's dismissal allowed Georgia to strip the tribe of its governmental forms. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the three goals stated in the slogan of the revolution
Alexxx [7]

Answer: "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity

Explanation: i am shmort

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many amendments are there in the constitution? why is it so difficult to amend the constitution?
    12·2 answers
  • Question 15.the doctrine of "stare decisis" empowers a court to change existing judicial precedent.
    11·1 answer
  • Filllllllll in the blank and brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • For how long did Islam’s Golden Age last?
    7·1 answer
  • Rutherford B. Hayes kept the army stationed in Southern states to keep order and
    6·2 answers
  • I NEED THIS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE PLEASE! 50 POINTS! Please help me out
    12·1 answer
  • After reading chapter 13 of our textbook please explain the justifications for the doctrine of manifest destiny, including at le
    10·1 answer
  • EXERCISE 2
    12·1 answer
  • How did the native americans feels when they first saw the pilgrems
    13·2 answers
  • Ngày Bác Hồ ra đi tìm đường cứu nước
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!