1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leona [35]
3 years ago
11

How did the Industrial Revolution help to cause a divide between the North & South?

History
2 answers:
nignag [31]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

I think you are assuming USA.

The North has accepted Industrialization and gaining economic strength which is against the South's ideology. The South was based on Agriculture economy which needed Labor (slaves).

Irina18 [472]3 years ago
4 0
It is probably more nearly correct to state that the Northern states offered more fertile soil for industrialization to grow and prosper than the South. The comments above about slavery are misstated. The Southern economy was indeed agrarian and dependent upon slave labor; however the reason for this is was that the economy in that portion of the country consisted of large scale plantations of staple crops, primarily cotton. It is manifestly incorrect to state that immigrants did not want to move to a slave society. Immigrants to this country came from agrarian economies, and would have preferred to continue that practice, however there was no available land in the South. It was under no circumstances a moral value judgment as the above answer alludes; they remained in large cities and worked in factories because they had no choice.
Slaves were in fact used for occasional factory work, including but not limited to the Tredegar Iron Works in Richmond, Va. Slaves also worked as blacksmiths, shipwrights, gin operators, carpenters, etc. The law of supply and demand , however, dictated that they were primarily used as plantation labor, not factory workers.
Industrialization was possible in the South, and it was indeed industrialized after Reconstruction, yet most of the workers were white; hardly any were former slaves.
Bottom line: industrialization came to the North because the North's climate, geography, etc. did not lend itself to large scale agriculture. Also, the North had an abundance of navigable streams which were absent in the South. The South was more suitable for large scale agriculture, and its economy developed in that fashion. Slavery was a necessary element in maintaining that economy; but it was not a value judgment.
You might be interested in
What are the factors that create the rise & fall of civilizations?
katrin2010 [14]

Answer: factors that lead civilizations to rise was Favourable environment and water and Common factors that may contribute to collapse are economical, environmental, social and cultural, and disruptions in one domain sometimes cascade into another. In some cases a natural disaster.

4 0
3 years ago
what is the correct term? Drop in activity across the country’s economy that lasts at least 6 months, can turn into a depression
seropon [69]

Answer:

It is called a recession, if not, a Financial crisis.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help I need this turned in fast
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

MAYOR!! It's right trust me

7 0
3 years ago
1. What was the role France played in the American Revolution?
zaharov [31]

Not 100% sure, but I think its D.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What impact did the first form of government have on the development of the United States?
omeli [17]

Answer:

The articles of confederation was the first type of government we had in the united states. This was their first attempt after breaking away from the British. In the articles of confederation, there was only 1 branch, the executive branch, which they solely relied on because they felt we needed this because the British were lacking it. They designed the articles of confederation to have a weak central government so they wouldn't become oppressive which they had seen from the British. Another thing was that each state only had 1 vote. This wasnt really fair for the larger states, because they have more people to represent. In order to make decisions, they had to get all 13 of the states vote, so it was nearly impossible to amend. Finally, the states all had thier own money systems, and there wasnt a common currency which made it very difficult to trade and travel.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The war bond drive alone raised over
    9·2 answers
  • After World War I, which factor was the MAJOR cause of the migration of many African Americans to the North?
    12·1 answer
  • How did america's involvement in world war ii differ from its participation in world war i? consider diplomacy, allied and enemi
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Council of Trent do to reform the Catholic church?
    7·1 answer
  • The Christian faith began in the Empire. It was founded by Jesus, who some believed to be the long-awaited . Jesus's life is tol
    14·2 answers
  • The head of government under a Parliamentary system is known as which of the selections below? Select one: A. Governor B. Electo
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about the phases of federalism is false?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the cause of sunni shiite split​
    9·2 answers
  • Fill in the blank with the right answer.
    6·1 answer
  • Advantages and disadvantages of multi regional theory of man​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!