1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgen [1.6K]
3 years ago
7

PLEASE HELP DUE TODAY IN 5 HOURS: I WILL GIVE YOU 40 POINTS!!!

History
1 answer:
Leokris [45]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1. Invasions by Barbarian tribes. The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders. Jan 14, 2014.1. Even as Rome was under attack from outside forces, it was also crumbling from within thanks to a severe financial crisis. Constant wars and overspending had significantly lightened imperial coffers, and oppressive taxation and inflation had widened the gap between rich and poor. In the hope of avoiding the taxman, many members of the wealthy classes had even fled to the countryside and set up independent fiefdoms. At the same time, the empire was rocked by a labor deficit. Rome’s economy depended on slaves to till its fields and work as craftsmen, and its military might had traditionally provided a fresh influx of conquered peoples to put to work. But when expansion ground to a halt in the second century, Rome’s supply of slaves and other war treasures began to dry up. A further blow came in the fifth century, when the Vandals claimed North Africa and began disrupting the empire’s trade by prowling the Mediterranean as pirates. With its economy faltering and its commercial and agricultural production in decline, the Empire began to lose its grip on Europe.

3. The rise of the Eastern Empire

The fate of Western Rome was partially sealed in the late third century, when the Emperor Diocletian divided the Empire into two halves—the Western Empire seated in the city of Milan, and the Eastern Empire in Byzantium, later known as Constantinople. The division made the empire more easily governable in the short term, but over time the two halves drifted apart. East and West failed to adequately work together to combat outside threats, and the two often squabbled over resources and military aid. As the gulf widened, the largely Greek-speaking Eastern Empire grew in wealth while the Latin-speaking West descended into economic crisis. Most importantly, the strength of the Eastern Empire served to divert Barbarian invasions to the West. Emperors like Constantine ensured that the city of Constantinople was fortified and well guarded, but Italy and the city of Rome—which only had symbolic value for many in the East—were left vulnerable. The Western political structure would finally disintegrate in the fifth century, but the Eastern Empire endured in some form for another thousand years before being overwhelmed by the Ottoman Empire in the 1400s.

4. Overexpansion and military overspending

At its height, the Roman Empire stretched from the Atlantic Ocean all the way to the Euphrates River in the Middle East, but its grandeur may have also been its downfall. With such a vast territory to govern, the empire faced an administrative and logistical nightmare. Even with their excellent road systems, the Romans were unable to communicate quickly or effectively enough to manage their holdings. Rome struggled to marshal enough troops and resources to defend its frontiers from local rebellions and outside attacks, and by the second century the Emperor Hadrian was forced to build his famous wall in Britain just to keep the enemy at bay. As more and more funds were funneled into the military upkeep of the empire, technological advancement slowed and Rome’s civil infrastructure fell into disrepair.

5. Government corruption and political instability

6. The arrival of the Huns and the migration of the Barbarian tribes

The Barbarian attacks on Rome partially stemmed from a mass migration caused by the Huns’ invasion of Europe in the late fourth century. When these Eurasian warriors rampaged through northern Europe, they drove many Germanic tribes to the borders of the Roman Empire. The Romans grudgingly allowed members of the Visigoth tribe to cross south of the Danube and into the safety of Roman territory, but they treated them with extreme cruelty. According to the historian Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman officials even forced the starving Goths to trade their children into slavery in exchange for dog meat. In brutalizing the Goths, the Romans created a dangerous enemy within their own borders. When the oppression became too much to bear, the Goths rose up in revolt and eventually routed a Roman army and killed the Eastern Emperor Valens during the Battle of Adrianople in A.D. 378. The shocked Romans negotiated a flimsy peace with the barbarians, but the truce unraveled in 410, when the Goth King Alaric moved west and sacked Rome. With the Western Empire weakened, Germanic tribes like the Vandals and the Saxons were able to surge across its borders and occupy Britain, Spain and North

Explanation:

You might be interested in
50 pts who answers!
aev [14]
He is humble and seek no power and can pull magical sword from stone
8 0
3 years ago
What was Commodore Perry's significant contribution to the beginning of Japan's transformation?
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

What was Commodore Perry's significant contribution to the beginning of Japan's transformation? He opened Japan to the West. Which similar challenge did China and Japan face following the Sino-Japanese War? Their isolation left them far behind Europe.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first settlement started by the pilgrims was on the new England cost at Ply mouth, Boston, or ports mouth
deff fn [24]
Plymouth was the first recorded settlement created by pilgrims on the New England Coastline. Hope it helps...
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following would explain the economic trend in the graph?
vazorg [7]

Answer:

Former colonies lacked trade infrastructure previously supported by the ruling power.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The opposite of a country that is homogeneous would be a country that is
belka [17]

Answer:

A. diverse

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If beef prices in the 1800's would have dropped, what would have happened to the cattle drives?
    10·1 answer
  • The power to declare war is: a-given to the states if the national government falls
    8·1 answer
  • New trade agreements are expected to
    9·1 answer
  • What problems did Benedict Arnold faced? List 3 problems.
    7·1 answer
  • What is one significant impact of world war 1 on American women?
    6·2 answers
  • What events led to the weakening of the spanish empire
    12·1 answer
  • what was the main purpose of the albany congress of 1754? select the best answer from the choices provided. to divide the ohio c
    7·1 answer
  • What role did black churches play in the post war back community
    7·1 answer
  • Indonesia is northwest of which continent
    5·2 answers
  • How did steam power affect agriculture in the United States prior to the Civil War?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!