1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgen [1.6K]
3 years ago
7

PLEASE HELP DUE TODAY IN 5 HOURS: I WILL GIVE YOU 40 POINTS!!!

History
1 answer:
Leokris [45]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1. Invasions by Barbarian tribes. The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders. Jan 14, 2014.1. Even as Rome was under attack from outside forces, it was also crumbling from within thanks to a severe financial crisis. Constant wars and overspending had significantly lightened imperial coffers, and oppressive taxation and inflation had widened the gap between rich and poor. In the hope of avoiding the taxman, many members of the wealthy classes had even fled to the countryside and set up independent fiefdoms. At the same time, the empire was rocked by a labor deficit. Rome’s economy depended on slaves to till its fields and work as craftsmen, and its military might had traditionally provided a fresh influx of conquered peoples to put to work. But when expansion ground to a halt in the second century, Rome’s supply of slaves and other war treasures began to dry up. A further blow came in the fifth century, when the Vandals claimed North Africa and began disrupting the empire’s trade by prowling the Mediterranean as pirates. With its economy faltering and its commercial and agricultural production in decline, the Empire began to lose its grip on Europe.

3. The rise of the Eastern Empire

The fate of Western Rome was partially sealed in the late third century, when the Emperor Diocletian divided the Empire into two halves—the Western Empire seated in the city of Milan, and the Eastern Empire in Byzantium, later known as Constantinople. The division made the empire more easily governable in the short term, but over time the two halves drifted apart. East and West failed to adequately work together to combat outside threats, and the two often squabbled over resources and military aid. As the gulf widened, the largely Greek-speaking Eastern Empire grew in wealth while the Latin-speaking West descended into economic crisis. Most importantly, the strength of the Eastern Empire served to divert Barbarian invasions to the West. Emperors like Constantine ensured that the city of Constantinople was fortified and well guarded, but Italy and the city of Rome—which only had symbolic value for many in the East—were left vulnerable. The Western political structure would finally disintegrate in the fifth century, but the Eastern Empire endured in some form for another thousand years before being overwhelmed by the Ottoman Empire in the 1400s.

4. Overexpansion and military overspending

At its height, the Roman Empire stretched from the Atlantic Ocean all the way to the Euphrates River in the Middle East, but its grandeur may have also been its downfall. With such a vast territory to govern, the empire faced an administrative and logistical nightmare. Even with their excellent road systems, the Romans were unable to communicate quickly or effectively enough to manage their holdings. Rome struggled to marshal enough troops and resources to defend its frontiers from local rebellions and outside attacks, and by the second century the Emperor Hadrian was forced to build his famous wall in Britain just to keep the enemy at bay. As more and more funds were funneled into the military upkeep of the empire, technological advancement slowed and Rome’s civil infrastructure fell into disrepair.

5. Government corruption and political instability

6. The arrival of the Huns and the migration of the Barbarian tribes

The Barbarian attacks on Rome partially stemmed from a mass migration caused by the Huns’ invasion of Europe in the late fourth century. When these Eurasian warriors rampaged through northern Europe, they drove many Germanic tribes to the borders of the Roman Empire. The Romans grudgingly allowed members of the Visigoth tribe to cross south of the Danube and into the safety of Roman territory, but they treated them with extreme cruelty. According to the historian Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman officials even forced the starving Goths to trade their children into slavery in exchange for dog meat. In brutalizing the Goths, the Romans created a dangerous enemy within their own borders. When the oppression became too much to bear, the Goths rose up in revolt and eventually routed a Roman army and killed the Eastern Emperor Valens during the Battle of Adrianople in A.D. 378. The shocked Romans negotiated a flimsy peace with the barbarians, but the truce unraveled in 410, when the Goth King Alaric moved west and sacked Rome. With the Western Empire weakened, Germanic tribes like the Vandals and the Saxons were able to surge across its borders and occupy Britain, Spain and North

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Women<br> • Slaves<br> • Native Americans<br> • Non-Christians<br> The groups in the box were all
worty [1.4K]

Answer:

Minorities.

Explanation:

All these people were given less rights over white christian men in history.

7 0
4 years ago
Which of the following presents one of Andrew Johnson's strengths and one of his weaknesses?
34kurt

nope its really A. He was loyal to the Union. / He was stubborn and uncompromising.  my human fella fellow human take my word i chose A and it was right

3 0
3 years ago
Read 3 more answers
The passage below describes a U.S. Supreme Court decision In 1940, the Texas Democratic Party refused to give an African America
grigory [225]

Answer:

This decision illustrates that the court has the right to review any judicial decision.

Explanation:

One of the most well-known powers that is attributed to the Supreme Court is the ability to judicially review any act, considered unconstitutional, that is not written in the federal constitution. This power is being illustrated in the text above.

This is because the text shows how the supreme court, judicially revised the decision that the black population could receive ballots to cast votes for candidates for governor. The supreme court states that the inclusion of the black vote is not described in the constitution and for that reason, the black people 's voting permission may undergo judicial review.

3 0
3 years ago
Who is the cop that killed Dante Wright?
Liono4ka [1.6K]

The police officer that killed Dante Wright is Kimberly Potter.

8 0
3 years ago
President Nixon was not worried about the 1972 presidential election.
Zigmanuir [339]

This is true because he had so many votes. he was president for 5 years. 1969-1974. If this information is wrong, please let me know in the comments. Hope this helps. -Moab

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • List at least five actions taken by residents of the camps to create a community and to live as normally as possible
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Tokugawa shogunate keep the power they gained?
    13·2 answers
  • What did the Lieutenant Governor raise the Indian people’s rent for
    7·1 answer
  • What is a free election?
    7·1 answer
  • Who are some of the settlers of south carolina colony
    8·1 answer
  • What was the turning point of the Revolutionary war? What events led to this victory? What battle convinced the British they cou
    14·1 answer
  • In pre-Revolutionary War
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone help me
    5·1 answer
  • How was Toussaint a king in one paragraph
    12·1 answer
  • State the rule of 72:
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!