Umayyad was more opened while Abbasid didn't want to interact with non-Arabs
They were sailors in search of a faster route to Asia.
George Washington helped shape the office's future role and powers, as well as set both formal and informal precedents for future presidents. Washington believed that it was necessary to strike a delicate balance between making the presidency powerful enough to function effectively in a national government, while also avoiding any image of establishing a monarchy or dictatorship. In the process, President Washington significantly influenced the path for the presidency moving forward, setting standards in all aspects, including political power, military practice, and economic policy.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
I believe that eyewitness are not a reliable source to solve a crime or problem. Those eyewitness play a major role in the investigation meaning that they have a advantage to change minds. Some studies think that people over the age of 50 years old aren't reliable for testimony. Though, some might think that study accusation is absurd, it may be correct in some ways.
Hope I could help! :)
