1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Xelga [282]
3 years ago
12

Show how acting frantically is different than acting calmly

History
2 answers:
vlabodo [156]3 years ago
8 0
Frantically would suggest that your mind and actions do not harmonize resulting in illogical behaviors and responses where the person is more anxious
calm would mean that the mind is at peace, the person can think through situations and events and create more logical reposonses
ANTONII [103]3 years ago
5 0
Frantically is like worried/upset/scared/"Where is it?!?"/"OMG NO!!"/anxious. While acting calmly is just Chill/Fine/OK/Peace ect;. Just make this in better words. :)
You might be interested in
The steppes provide
Virty [35]

Answer:

B. Fertile land for agriculture.

6 0
2 years ago
What were the colonists called who fought against the British Army?
sleet_krkn [62]

Hi there! Your answer would be: <em>The Minutemen.</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Around 1000 b.c., what did the Eastern woodlands Indians settle in? (____ villages.)
Pavlova-9 [17]
The term Woodland Indians was created in 1932 to describe a prehistoric culture that was significantly different than the nomadic Archaic Indians that roamed the eastern third of the North American Continent from 6000 B. C. to about 1000 B. C. It is the third and final general cultural description applied to native people prior to the formation of tribes, the final stage of development of these prehistoric people. Were the Woodland Indians historic<span> or </span>prehistoric<span>? Woodland Indians, as with all later Indian nations until the Cherokee, were prehistoric. The Cherokee adopted a written language in 1820, making them a historic tribe from that time on. 
</span>
i hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
What happened in hell?
dimaraw [331]

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

4 0
2 years ago
Was it the us supreme court or the california supreme court that commuted charles mansons sentence
Lesechka [4]
California supreme court
took over cult leader Charles Manson's sentence after refuting the death penalty for 4 years, after which finally deciding to give him life without poorly. He died from natural causes in prison on November 19th, 2017
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What Confucianism structure is important
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement correctly describes the byzantine empire?
    10·2 answers
  • 1. What nation experienced extreme hyperinflation, or skyrocketing cost of goods, that contributed to the start of World War II?
    15·2 answers
  • Most Americans agreed on what two changes to the Articles of Confederation?
    7·2 answers
  • How does Olmsted think life has changed in America by 1871
    13·2 answers
  • Which explains why the United States issued an embargo on Japanese trade in 1941?
    8·1 answer
  • Who created god ?<br> i really want to know this one
    11·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from Khrushchev's letter, and then answer the questions. In this letter, Khrushchev is saying that he Kennedy's
    7·2 answers
  • 4
    12·1 answer
  • How can spillovers, or externalities, be both good and bad?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!