Under the Articles of Confederation congress didn't have enough power. They couldn't tax the states. This meant that congress would eventually fail.
<span>“I've always had great faith in and respect for our space program, and what happened today does nothing to diminish it.” I hope this helps you :) </span>
Answer:
We will notice that even though they were written within a period of just over a decade and mostly by the same people, the differences are quite clear between them.
Explanation:
If we compare the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the U.S we would get a fair idea of the differences between them. The Articles were heavily criticized for centralizing all the powers in the hands of state governments and leaving the central government at their disposal. But this wasn't the only distinguishing point between these documents. The two distinguished in several ways such as the judiciary, power of levying taxes, the number of votes in Congress, etc.
Here is the answer to the given question above. The abolitionists oppose annexation of new western territory during the 1840 because they <span>feared admission of the new slave states. The abolition movement campaigned for no more slaves. Hope this answers your question. </span>
Basically Persia was able to defeat Athens in the Peloponnesian War because over the years Persia had grew in power and had gotten stronger than Athens, But even though the Athens were very powerful their selves. It was no match against the Persians and they had unfortunately fallen in a very long battle.
Did this help with your question?