Answer:
B. New York is the correct answer.
Explanation:
I think False i am not 100% sure but i hope i helped
The suffragists were people, predominantly female, who fought for introducing voting rights in the United States for women. They began fighting after the civil war when African Americans were given rights, making women the only ones left without it, and it lasted until 1918 because that's when their fight climaxed as they were given voting rights with the 19th amendment.
Answer:
1. c
2. e
Explanation:
1. <u>The Second Great Awakening was a movement that spread across the US in the end of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century.</u>
It opposed to the eighteenth century Enlightenment philosophy and managed to <em>reestablish the status of religion under the influence of Romanticism</em>.
The individualism and the return to oneself <u>promoted by romanticism</u> led the man to regain contact with spirituality which made him rediscover the Supernatural as well as God.
2. <u>As a result of the Second Great Awakening, the Protestant religion started to regain importance</u> and it served as base for two denominations that emerged from it.
<em>Methodism</em> refers to the teaching of <u>John Wesley which promoted the practice of holy life and salvation for all</u>. Methodists abide the rules of scripture (code of conduct) which is how they got their name.
<em>Baptist church</em> represents another wide spread church which <u>baptizes only believing adults.</u> Different baptist groups developed different beliefs and ways of worship since <u>every local baptist church is autonomous and teaches differently.</u>
Answer:
The Arizona v. United States decision struck down all Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration.
Explanation:
Federalism is a form of government that stands in direct opposition to the notion of centralism, that is, to the form of political organization of states in which power appears centralized in the hands of a single governing group. Federalism, for its part, allows power (and the freedom to make decisions) to be distributed independently to the federal, state, and local government.
Under federalism, the rules governing immigration matters are different for the federal government, the state government, and the place where one can set their own guidelines for this. With regard to immigration, we can say that since the 1990s, states have increasingly adopted the political domain of immigration, and state involvement in immigration is partly due to their interest in preventing illegal immigrants from accessing public services, as educational and welfare benefits. In addition, we can state that federal immigration laws outperform state laws.
False information about immigration federalism is: "Arizona's decision against the United States overturned all of Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration."
