I'm pretty sure the answer is D because it seems like the most logical statement that could be made by an explorer.
...are there answer choices..there’s a few possible answers
Explanation:
Rhythm, in music, the placement of sounds in time. In its most general sense, rhythm (Greek rhythmos, derived from rhein, “to flow”) is an ordered alternation of contrasting elements. The notion of rhythm also occurs in other arts (e.g., poetry, painting, sculpture, and architecture) as well as in nature (e.g., biological rhythms).
Rhythm
QUICK FACTS
RELATED TOPICS
Music
Eurythmics
Metre
Rhythmic mode
Īqāʿāt
Isorhythm
Period
Aksak
Beat
Colotomic structure
Attempts to define rhythm in music have produced much disagreement, partly because rhythm has often been identified with one or more of its constituent, but not wholly separate, elements, such as accent, metre, and tempo. As in the closely related subjects of verse and metre, opinions differ widely, at least among poets and linguists, on the nature and movement of rhythm. Theories requiring “periodicity” as the sine qua non of rhythm are opposed by theories that include in it even nonrecurrent configurations of movement, as in prose or plainchant
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Musical Traits: The music in this context displays a lot of similarities and differences between European music, pre-Columbian and African musicology. The compositions seem to have deep meaning among individual traits and culture."
