1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveticcg [70]
3 years ago
13

Choose the term that best matches the description given.

Law
1 answer:
aleksandr82 [10.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Forensic animator.

Explanation:

A forensic toxicologist refers to a professional or an expert who is a certified investigator in determining and identifying the presence of hard drugs or poisons in the body by scientifically testing bodily fluids and tissues.

This ultimately implies that, forensic toxicologists are certified professionals (investigators) who are saddled with the responsibility of collecting evidence e.g presence of alcohol, hard drugs, or poisons, after an unfortunate incident such as murder has occurred. This is to determine whether or not the evidence collected at the crime scene, from the victim or suspect are connected to the crime.

Forensic animator: provides digital 3D crime scene reconstructions that can be manipulated to test different theories and sequences of events.

A chain of custody can be defined as a paper trail containing the chronological order of items of evidence and how they have been handled, controlled, transferred, analyzed, and disposed during the investigation of a case.

This ultimately implies that, a chain of custody contains all the details or informations regarding the investigators (people) who handled, controlled, transferred, analyzed, and disposed an evidence in the course of carrying out investigations on a particular case. The most important and significant part of an investigation is the evidence because it helps to unravel the truth and facts relating to a case. Therefore, it is very important and essential to document and maintain a chain of custody so as to preserve the evidence.

You might be interested in
(Gradpoint forensic Science 2 unit 1 drug evidence quiz) please
Serhud [2]

Answer:

This test uses formaldehyde and sulfuric acid. The solution will turn purple when introduced to heroin, morphine, or other opium drugs.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which of the roles in the court system that we discussed would you want as a career.
SpyIntel [72]

Answer: COURT REPOTER, Court reporters, also known as guardians of the record because of their impartiality and role within the judicial process, capture the words spoken by everyone during a court or deposition proceeding. Court reporters then prepare verbatim transcripts of proceedings.

Explanation: i am not sure what you and your teacher where talking about but here's a answer

8 0
3 years ago
At an open or uncantrolled intersection, yiel if ____
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

Yield if theres a car that arrived first

Explanation:

Yield to vehicles already in theintersection or entering it in front of you. Always yield to the car that arrived first.

4 0
3 years ago
What did the Supreme Court rule in Baker v Carr ?.
Tanya [424]

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.

About Equal Protection Clause

The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances.  Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.

To know more about Baker v. Carr:

brainly.com/question/29398317

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
The LDF attorneys hoped that the arguments set forth in the Boykin v. Alabama brief would eventually become the basis for the de
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna

Explanation:

In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.

By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What problems exist with anarchy
    8·1 answer
  • 15. The description of the lawmaking process in
    10·1 answer
  • The category of criminogenic needs that cannot be treated is
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these action would be protected by the first amendment
    8·2 answers
  • Si unit brings uniformity in measurement throughout the world. give reason​
    12·1 answer
  • I need Help with this ASAP!?
    15·1 answer
  • Should Cuomo resign or not and why?
    15·1 answer
  • Who has chegg please answer i need answers​
    8·1 answer
  • If arrested by private security, Miranda Rights are always provided.<br> False<br> True
    15·2 answers
  • What causes the object that moves along a surface to slow down and eventually stop​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!