Answer:
A
Explanation:
It allows laws to be inconsistent from state to state.
Answer:
It is necessary to limit individual rights because the fundamental rights are good but giving extra rights makes a person feel distinguished from the society and establish their supremacy.
In a democracy, the rights that are being written in the constitution of different countries is necessary but on the other hand, granting extra rights to the citizens can destroy democracy and establish a sense of helplessness.
That's it you need to know!
Hope it helps you mate!
This is based on who is telling the truth. The defendant denys being in the city at the time of the murder, but then a local newspaper states that he heard gunshots from inside his apartment the day of the murder (which would be impossible if he wasn't in the city at the same of the murder). There could also be a chance that the newspaper could be lying mainly because the defendant objected that the evidence was correct. In this case, the judge should take this into consideration especially when a local newpaper article announced that the defendant heard gunshots after saying that he was never in the city. So I would say, the newspaper article could be evidence to prove that the defendant is responsible for the murder.
Answer:
That's kinda cool that we have the same name! Accept mine is spelled
J-A-Y-D-I-N