Answer:
At 6% $3,529.412 will be invested
At 11% $6,470.588 will be invested
Explanation:
Let x be the investment for 6% stock
And (10,000-x) is the investment it 11% stock
Let I be interest earned on both investments.
Using the formula
Principal(p)= Interest(I)*Rate(r)*Time(t)
p/RT= I
So considering both investments
x/(6%*1)= (10,000-x)/(11%*1)
x/0.06= (10,000-x)/0.11
Cross-multiply
0.11x= 0.06(10,000-x)
0.11x= 600- 0.06x
Rearranging
0.11x+ 0.06x= 600
0.17x= 600
x= 600/0.17= 3,529.412 amount invested at 6%
Amount invested at 11%= 10,000-3,529.412
= 6,470.588
Answer:
Taking $1 from Carl and giving it to Andy would increase society's total utility.
Explanation:
Since Andy's income is less than other three people when a $1 taken from Carl would increase Andy's utility more than the loss in utility of Carl. Thats why total utility would increase.
Answer:
Joshua statement is correct.
Explanation:
Marginal cost:
Is the cost of producing a new unit.
Average Cost:
If the marginal cost of this plant is lower than their other plants, it can decrease his average cost by increasing the amount produced.
This increase in production decrease the impact of the fixed cost in the unit price. At more production the average cost will decrease. Because the variable cost keeps at the same value but the fixed cost per unit decrease.
Answer:
The correct option is A, Samantha weed and Adam will rake because these are the goods each has a comparative advantage in.
Explanation:
The opportunity formula comes handy in this case, which is given below:
opportunity cost formula=what one sacrifices/what one gains
If Samantha were to weed flower beds, opportunity cost is computed thus:
Opportunity cost of Samantha weeding flower beds=8/4= 2 bags of leaves raked
The opportunity of Adam weeding flower beds=25/5 =5 bags of leaves raked.
In a nutshell ,if Samantha weeds flowers they would lose 2 bags of leaves raked while if Adam were to do so same, they would lose 5 bags of leaves raked, conclusively Samantha should weed flower beds since she has lower opportunity, higher comparative advantage