1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aneli [31]
3 years ago
8

What is the policy of “appeasement’? How did it prove to be an ineffective strategy?

History
1 answer:
DaniilM [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Appeasement, at least in the context of WWII, was a tactic used by the Allies in which they let Hitler take more and more land as long as he promised to not take anymore. It was essentially the Allies going "you can have this, but no more" over and over in an attempt to avoid war. This was ineffective because they never introduced a sort of punishment if Hitler were to take more land. Essentially, they were letting him take land with little to no fight. It's now generally regarded as a sign of weakness and cowardice.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Friedrich von steuben trained troops from which side of the American revolution?
jeka94

He trained the Continental Army troops

Explanation:

  • He was a general during the American Revolution who came from Germany.
  • He trained all colonists how to fight. He even trained them when it was one of the scariest winters and when lot of soldiers were dying.
  • Though he trained all Americans how to fight, he spoke no english, so no one in their right mind in the colonies at a lean time had any idea what he was saying, so he learned how to follow his gestures about what to do and how to do it.

Learn more on Friedrich Von Steuben on

brainly.com/question/1103775

brainly.com/question/927935

#learnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
GIVING 800 PTS PLS REPLY I NEED URGENT i will put up separate questions so you can claim point after you help me I will message
ICE Princess25 [194]

Explanation:

I dont know man but black lives matter!

5 0
3 years ago
Which branch can declare acts of the President unconstitutional?
juin [17]

Answer:

The Judicial branch

Explanation:

Judicial Branch Powers: The Legal branch can proclaim demonstrations of the President illegally, which eliminates them from the law. The Judicial branch can likewise pronounce laws passed by Congress to be illegal in entire or to some extent.

6 0
3 years ago
Check the names of each of the following people who could be categorized as loyalists during the War for Independence.
ycow [4]

C) joseph brant

hdbehdudbsiosmshs

4 0
2 years ago
In 1870 President Grant signed a proclamation stating that __________.
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer: A. Reconstruction in Texas could begin

Explanation:  Following the defeat of the Confederate States in the American Civil War, Texas was mandated to rejoin the United States of America. ... Texas fully rejoined the Union on March 30, 1870, when President Grant signed the act to readmit Texas to Congressional Representation.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would nazis kill people just because they thought they weren’t normal *read the passage to find the answer *
    10·1 answer
  • Besides religion, what other changes came to sub-saharan africa as a result of increased contact with the outside world?
    11·1 answer
  • Who was involved in the case of gibbons versus ogden
    15·2 answers
  • What were some important results of william’s conquest?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these gives the main purpose of the passage?
    15·2 answers
  • How did continued conflict with the British lead the American colonists to rebel?<br> summarize
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING, WORTH 25 POINTS :)
    7·2 answers
  • Why was the potsdam confrence important
    5·1 answer
  • What were the movement's goals?
    14·1 answer
  • Do research to find out how Christianity has influenced the development of the United States. Provide examples of how it has aff
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!