Answer: I would actually disagree on this
Explanation: In America there was a time period where conscientious objectors were ordered by the government to vote. However, their denial to vote brought them severe prison time, torture and opposition. If 16 year olds could vote then people with religious beliefs or who are conscientious objectors would be bullied by political peers and such pressure could obligate them to go against their conscious and norms. From ages 16 to 18 a person is too young to commit the right decisions without a person actually influencing them. A person is capable of thinking for themselves without outward influences when they are about 21 and up. Also, voting is not necessary, it’s simple tradition. It’s a superficial thing, people think they choose the president but in reality it’s the Supreme Court who makes that decision for you. You could fact check that if you attend a civics class or if you directly ask a representative from congress.
I don't think that is is motif or resolution. I believe it is either the exposition, because expostition can give you background info. on the story, in the beginning of the novel or work of fiction.
Malvolio's fate does seem fair, because it was his own insistence on fighting that got him killed. Tybalt had no intention of fighting him, only Romeo and Romeo refused the challenge. Mercutio's embarrassment for Romeo's "cowardice" and need to constantly be fighting is what accelerated the fight and it's why he died. Shakespeare included him in the play though, for comedic relief through the first half and then to incite the punishment of banishment in the fight scene so that the ending could happen.
