According to a different source, this question refers to the article "Looters Leave Nothing Behind in Storm’s Wake" by Mike Perlstein and Brian Thevenot.
This article narrates the events that took place in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. The article tells us that looting and chaos took over the city, but that policemen did nothing to contain this. Moreover, we learn that some policemen even joined in on the looting.
The police officers justified not stopping the looters by arguing that there was nothing they could do to stop their actions, as they could communicate with their superiors. The authors state that:
<em>"Officers claimed there was nothing they could do to contain the anarchy, saying their radio communications had broken down and they had no direction from commanders."</em>
They also said that they did not have enough police officers to face the crowd, and that a mass riot would most likely break out if you tried to contain the people.
The contextual meaning of the word paper as used in the writing is; Choice 3: a formal piece of writing that is published.
<h3>Which definition reflects the meaning of the word papers in this passage?</h3>
The use of the word paper in the writing has a connotative meaning which is; a formal piece of writing that is published.
On this note, it follows that Einstein's works were referred to as papers in the passage.
Read more on connotative meaning;
brainly.com/question/711021
#SPJ1
Answer: B. That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community; of all the various modes and forms of government that is best, which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and that, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.
Explanation:
The statement from the passage that best supports the claim that citizens have a right to rebel against the government if it does not serve their needs is option B.
The government is put in place for the welfare of the people. Anybody in government ought to know that he or she is not going their for his or her benefit but rather is going there to serve the people. In a case whereby s particular government is found wanting and doesn't do what's expected, such government should be liable and held responsible and the people have the right to rebel.
Answer:
It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.
Explanation:
In the given claim, counterclaim, and rebuttal, the main issue discussed is that of allowing children to play video games. The claim made is that children become violent from playing violent games.
The counterclaim, on the other claim, presents that they are allowed to play any game they want <em>"under adult supervision"</em>. The rebuttal then presents the idea that allowing children only gives them unnecessary authority.
The rebuttal presented is ineffective as it failed to provide any logical reasoning for opposing the counterclaim.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.