In a word, the social comparison theory states that we evaluate ourselves in relation to others in order to broaden and/or improve our frame of reference.
When objective measurements are absent or not thought to be important, it ostensibly serves as a reality check. On the plus side, the comparison might provide a framework for "information collecting." Without the example of other individuals, we might not even realize what is even possible. Our perception of what we can conceive for ourselves can be expanded by looking at other people's examples. It motivates us to achieve excellence. We have the chance to get closer to perfection by seeing others practice it. We learn about what's effective when we observe someone or an organization accomplishing its objectives. By extending our casing of reference and applying what we gain from this perception, we gain ground toward our own proficient objectives.
Contrasting our existence with the existence of another person can be a strong chance for appreciation. One of the aces of correlation is the capacity to take advantage of inspiration we probably won't have all alone when we bridle the force of local area to push toward our favored future.
To learn more about comparison, refer:-
brainly.com/question/24306502
#SPJ4
Answer:
Mr. Wolfshiem
Explanation:
The was extracted from The Great Gatsby a Novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald.
Nick and Gatsby saw Mr. Wolfshiem
Mr. Wolfshiem decided to leave Nick and Gatsby alone to talk after he (Mr. Wolfshiem) finished his lunch.
Though, Gatsby told him not to be in haste (to leave), Mr. Wolfshiem declined.
What Mr. Wolfshiem meant by being "from a different generation" is that, he was much older that Nick and Gatsby (he later on stated this, when he said he was 50 years old)
Mr. Wolfshiem appreciated that he was invited to lunch and he also made it known that he didn't really care to impose on Gatsby's chat with Nick about their discussion
I am sick, weak, and don’t want to go to school today.
Commas is what this sentence needs if I interpreted this right.
Answer:
(1) of (actually supposed to be "of a")
(2) by
(3) to
(4) in
(5) from
