Explanation:
The First Amendment prohibits the Congress from making a law "respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". This provision was later expanded to state and local governments, through the incorporation of the First Amendment.
The answer is <span>Convenience.
She aware that interrupting the people who are hurrying to the get would potentially disturb them from fulfilling a certain schedule.
The people who are sitting leisurely will most likely had some time to filled in the questionaire.
</span>
Answer:
The incentives favor running negative commercials regardless of what the other candidate does because if only one candidate runs negative ads, that candidate will have an electoral advantage
Explanation:
Strategic candidates air negative ads because the incentives favor running negative commercials regardless of what the other candidate does because if only one candidate runs negative ads, that candidate will have an electoral advantage over the other candidate which is why the two candidate will both would be happier if neither of them had run negative ads as opposed to both of them or one of them running the negative campaign ads.
Answer:
Other guy is wrong. This isnt about abortion its about contraception. This is what i found on google.: Supreme Court of the United States
Connecticut Supreme Court reversed. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), is a landmark case in the United States about access to contraception.
