1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ludmilkaskok [199]
3 years ago
14

Question 1: Does this new law violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? If it does, what section(s) and why?

Law
1 answer:
malfutka [58]3 years ago
8 0

Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, I provided explanations about the<em> Charter of Rights and Freedoms </em>law.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The<em> Charter of Rights and Freedoms</em> law is a law applied in Canada, which was first signed as law dating back to the year 1982. It basically consists of laws meant to safeguard the rights and freedoms of citizens, such as their:

  • freedom of expression,
  • right to equality, and
  • right to privacy, etc.
You might be interested in
List 3 of Preserve Evidence law
jonny [76]

Answer:

The evidence that must be preserved is limited to evidence that would be both material and exculpatory. Evidence is material if it is relevant to an important issue in the case, and evidence is exculpatory if it supports a defense or tends to show that the defendant is not guilty of the crime.

Explanation:

This might not answer your question, but this was from the wedsite below......

https://www.justia.com

8 0
3 years ago
In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni
german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0
3 years ago
How many states in the United States have abolish the death penalty ?
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

Twenty one

Explanation:

Currently there are 21 states that have abolished the death penalty leaving 29 states still having the death penalty active

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following expressions is equal to the total investment of a no-load mutual fund?
stira [4]
C) net asset value x number of shares
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is it illegal to transport a pet in the back of an open pick up truck
Levart [38]

Answer:

It depends on where you are.

Explanation:

in some states and countrys the answer is yes, you can transport a pet in the back of an open pickup truck. Others will say no, you can not. For many good reasons.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • _____ involves subjecting the evidence and the reference or standard to the same tests. This process determines if two or more o
    9·1 answer
  • If there was a robbery 4 weeks ago and the body was found yesterday, and the police just noticed. Who’s to blame for the crime??
    12·2 answers
  • URGENT PLEASE HELP! LAW QUESTION
    14·1 answer
  • How can you drop two eggs the fewest amount of times, without them breaking?
    15·2 answers
  • More Points for you guys!
    15·1 answer
  • How many different laws are there will give best answer brainest
    15·2 answers
  • Question 15 (True/False Worth 2 points)
    8·1 answer
  • Driving under the influence of prescription drugs is the same as drinking and driving. A)true B)false
    5·2 answers
  • Is there need money for upgrade brainly
    5·1 answer
  • What is the non-intervention perspective?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!