The author who described the problems to industrialize England was Andrew Carnegie
1.You can still always have power over your land.
2.No matter what you still can rule.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was adopted in the Constitution of Canada in 1982. This Charter guarantees the rights and freedoms of every citizens in Canada. It ensures various political rights to Canadian people and civil rights to everyone who resides in Canada.
The Charter is similar to the American Bill of Rights and also forms first part of the Constitution Act of 1982. The Charter tends to protect fundamental rights of evey citizen such as voting, fair judgements, freedom of religion, thought, freedom of the press, right to peaceful assembly, freedom of association, etc.
The Charter also protects the rights of the First Nations people. First Nations is the term used in Canada to specify those people or tribes who had first hand encounter with Europeans, also known as Aboriginal people.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
