I don't really know but can some one give us a answer
Answer:
Having more oil than water can majorly affect the country because - as we already know - oil is very damaging to the environment if mishandled, however, it brings in a pretty hefty profit. Although it brings in money, water is more important. That brings us to the answer to our question: Having more oil than water affects the way that the countries economy functions because the less water you have, the more the people of the country are effected and the more that the countries economy is damaged (this means that people are then being negatively effected and this can cause everything to fall apart).
Does this answer your question? If it doesn't make sense, I can always clarify.
Hope this helps!!
Have a nice day :)
Explanation:
Answer:
Wireshark and GassWire are both network monitoring and security tools. But by contrast, Wireshark is a raw packet sniffer listening on the interface of activities in a network line, while the Glasswire uses the dashboard relay approach to act as firewalls to suspicious activities in a network system.
Explanation:
Wireshark and GlassWire by comparison are both network monitoring and security tools. By contrast, Wireshark as network monitoring and security tool works as a raw packet sniffer listening on the interface of activities in a network line, while the Glasswire on the contrary uses the dashboard relay approach to act as firewalls that creates alerts for suspicious activities in a network system.
As a Network Manager, I would prefer to use the Glasswire network monitoring software because of its dashboard interface that avails me the opportunity to modify my firewalls settings. Besides, it is gives me the privileges I seek to know about suspicious activities before acting on them as compared to the Wireshark when monitoring a net
In Segura v. the United States (1984), although evidence discovered during an illegal entry into an apartment was excluded, evidence later found in the apartment with a warrant obtained with information totally unconnected with the illegal entry was admissible under the harmless error doctrine.
<h3>What is a Harmless Error?</h3>
- In terms of American law, a harmless error doctrine is when a trial judge makes a decision that, while incorrect, does not satisfy the requirements for a losing party to successfully challenge the trier of fact's first judgment on appeal or to demand a new trial.
- It is simplest to comprehend harmless error doctrine in an evidentiary setting. According to Federal Rule of Evidence 103, evidentiary errors are subject to harmless error analysis.
- The general requirement when contending that evidence was wrongfully admitted or excluded is to demonstrate that the trial judge's correct decision could have, on the balance of probability, led to the opposite finding of fact.
To learn more about Harmless Error refer to:
brainly.com/question/14287771
#SPJ4
