Answer: win because Bill had a legal right to drink alcohol.
Explanation: Bill is twenty-five years which is above the alcohol consumption age. However, if Bill uncle now refuses to pay Bill as agreed. The uncle claims that because Bill suffered no detriment by refraining from alcohol, and that because his non-drinking did not constitute consideration, no contract was formed. If Bill sues his uncle, Bill will win because Bill had a legal right to drink alcohol at that age.
Answer:
In June 2011, after pinning WWE Champion John Cena on Raw,[148] Rey Mysterio at Capitol Punishment,[149] and finally Alberto Del Rio again in a No. 1 contendership match all within one week, Punk revealed that his contract was to expire on July 17 at Money in the Bank and vowed to leave the company with the WWE Championship
Explanation:
Liberal because it is on the left
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
