1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julia-pushkina [17]
3 years ago
7

How would you describe the power of an emperor? How does this seem different from a democracy?

History
1 answer:
Nadusha1986 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

An emperor will act as the power for a whole nation and or country. Similar to emperors in japan who would created dynasties. In these dynasties it would consist of people born into royal families and no one outside of them could run for office or become ruler. They would have complete control or say over everything as a whole and could go against what close lords and nobles would had to say about laws and regulations, for in the end they had the final word. Now as for a democracy, they let anyone permitted to able to rule or run for office. Yet, in history as democracies started to bloom, many people such as slaves and woman, were not allowed the freedom to vote or run for a leader position. A democracy can differ from the power of an emperor because there is no royal blood line being followed and all people who are deemed eligible can run for a spot of power.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
2
victus00 [196]

Answer:

dude next time make the question clearer to understand D.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Choose the option below that best summarizes how the Protestant and Catholic
makkiz [27]

Answer:

theanswer is B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was it a problem that congress did not have the power to tax under the articles of confederation?
alexdok [17]
Because a lot of people were not subject to it and so they werent taxed
7 0
3 years ago
Why were Punic Wars fought between Carthage and Rome?
mariarad [96]
Location is Rome if I am correct
5 0
3 years ago
What was the north's plan for winning the civil war?
Rudik [331]
Their plan was called the Anaconda plan.
They wanted to blockade the Southern coast to prevent them from receiving resources from other countries. They also wanted to capture the Mississippi River to effectively cut the Confederacy in half (Battle of Vicksburg). The final step in their plan was to capture the Confederate capital city (Richmond).
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The middle class that emerged during the industrial revolution consisted mainly of
    7·2 answers
  • What was the main reason of rivarly amongg the trading companies.
    13·1 answer
  • What types of technology changed farming in Texas after the Civil War era? List at least three different types of technology.
    14·1 answer
  • Martin schongauer was the master of what new technique developed in the mid-1400s in northern europe?
    10·1 answer
  • After their success at destroying a Roman city, the Goths recrossed a narrow stretch of ocean, carrying treasure stolen in war,
    7·1 answer
  • United States History Multiple Choice Question please help!
    7·1 answer
  • How did the black death effect Europe?"
    10·2 answers
  • ANSWER ASAPPPPPPP
    14·2 answers
  • Was the issuance of the Declaration of Independence a continuation of the deteriorating relationship between
    11·1 answer
  • PLEADE HELP WILL Give brainliest Write three body paragraphs for an essay arguing that either the UNIA or the
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!