1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetradugi [14.3K]
3 years ago
10

What economic gains did Alexander the Great obtain from conquering territories?

History
2 answers:
MaRussiya [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C: He developed new trading partners.

tester [92]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<em>C. He developed new trading partners. </em>

<em />

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following are non-price determinants of supply?
USPshnik [31]
1. New producers entering the market.  (More businesses producing a product or service will mean a greater supply of that product or service.)

2. Government taxes and subsidies.  (High taxes on a product may discourage suppliers, whereas government subsidies will encourage more of the product to be supplied.  A recent example was government subsidy for the production of ethanol, which caused a strong increase in ethanol production and supplies.)

4. Cost of the product or services.  (High input costs to provide the product or service will tend to decrease supply, as profit margins for producers are affected.)

5. Future expectation of prices.   This one is tricky to call a "non-price determinant," but it's not a current, actual price.  It's the anticipation that prices and sales will be strong at some future point.  So, for instance, if there is an expectation that flying cars (or personal helicopters) will someday be a high-demand item that will sell for high prices, that will spur development and supply of such an item.

<em>The only one I left out was #3, effect of mass media advertising -- because that is something that is a determinant of demand rather than supply.</em>
8 0
2 years ago
Matching the follow terms 1-25:
Serjik [45]

Explanation:

ksksksksksksksksksksksksksksksks

6 0
3 years ago
A similarity between most women and men farmers in colonial America was that:
spayn [35]

Answer:

D. They worked hard

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
How did the Homestead Act affect US expansion?
dexar [7]
It <span>opened up settlement in the western </span><span>United States (people could now go settle in the west with the Indians! fun! bet no one will get hurt!) Approximately 1500 homestead claims had been established. Also freed slaves could claim land in the west as well. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is an example of how Thomas Jefferson’s political views changed after he became president?       
    13·1 answer
  • Why was William Becknell known as the "father of the Santa Fe Trail"?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is the spanish american war of 1898 often considered a major turning point in u.s. history?
    5·2 answers
  • When the United States of America began to be a country, there were only 13 states. Now there are 50! How do you think these new
    14·1 answer
  • In the caste system, the Brahmans were
    9·2 answers
  • 5 RECOMENDACIONES PARA EVITAR UN CONFLICTO Y<br>5 BENEFICIOS DE UNA CONVIVENCIA ARMONIOSA
    12·1 answer
  • How did Parliament take control of the British government
    8·1 answer
  • How did the crusades impact the Europeans?
    7·1 answer
  • Which cultural trend is best illustrated in this photograph?
    11·1 answer
  • Question 6 of 20
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!