Why is 13/0 irrational plsssss help!!!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

Kobotan [32]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

i think its because it is an odd number im in middle school so im not sure but let me know if this is right

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

-3 greater then or equal to > -1

enot [183]

-3 is actually less than -1

it can't be equal because they are 2 different values

and it can't be greater than because if you place -3 and -1 in a number Line, -1 is closer to 0 which equals that -1 is greater than -3

5 0

3 years ago

The area of a square is given by x2, where x is the length of one side. Mary's original garden was in the shape of a square. She

Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

$128\text{ ft}^{2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

We have been given that the area of a square is given by $x^2$ , where x is the length of one side.

Mary's original garden was in the shape of a square. She has decided to double the area of her garden. So the new area of Mary's garden will be 2 times the area of original garden.

We can represent this information in an equation as:

$\text{Area of Mary's new garden}=2x^{2}$

Therefore, the expression $2x^2$ will represent the area of Mary's new garden.

To evaluate the area of new garden, if the side length of Mary's original garden was 8 feet, we will substitute x equals 8 in our expression.

$\text{Area of Mary's new garden}=2(8\text{ ft})^{2}$

$\text{Area of Mary's new garden}=2*64\text{ ft}^{2}$

$\text{Area of Mary's new garden}=128\text{ ft}^{2}$

Therefore, the area of Mary's new garden will be 128 square feet.

4 0

3 years ago

How do you divide big numbers?<br>like for example, 2,673 ÷ 486?

Dahasolnce [82]

The easiest way I know is to multiply the divisor by different numbers to see how many times it will go into the dividend. multiplying 486 by 2 or three and seeing which one gets closest.

3 0

3 years ago

In the theory of learning, the rate at which a subject is memorized is assumed to be proportional to the amount that is left to

fiasKO [112]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the statement:

M: is total to be memorized

A(t): the amount memorized.

The key issue is translate this statement as equation "rate at which a subject is memorized is assumed to be proportional to the amount that is left to be memorized"

memorizing rate is $\frac{dA(t)}{dt}$ .