Answer:
Essential Question/Assumption: “What is taught is what is learned.”
I disagree with this assumption.
Students are taught language in class for them to learn based on the curriculum that needed to be completed by the students and the teachers. They are given those important language modules with contents and lessons like grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, etc. Indeed, they are taught with information but it doesn’t mean they acquire them. It all boils down if the taught language is acquired or just another information delivered but passively learned.
Basically, what is taught in class is controlled and normally followed a rote learning process aiming to get good scores in exams. This kind of learning is very objective and information learned is forgotten day by day when the information learned is not relevant to daily conversations.
We can see that students who passively learned English through movie watching, constant reading can learn more quickly than those students diligently study words and verbs which are taught in class.
You would be surprised when a teacher asks a student a particular idea taught in class. However, student can answer more sensible information aside from what is taught, since answers are based on student understanding, which is not directly taught by the teacher. The student comes up with answers based on her/his research, previous readings, instructions from home or peers. So learning is not limited to what is taught but it’s more of synthesizing everything. The fact about what is taught in class is just bridging the information students have learned previously.
Somehow what is taught is just an additional information that can help students improve their language learning. Aside from what they have learned in class, they also have their extra reading and information that can help them improve in learning a language.
hello there the answer is b.Angie ate the soft and chewy brownie at the table
because b is the only one that doesn't have a dangling modifier
i hope this helps
Panic would give you extreme fear to the point where you're frozen.
On the eighth night, the narrator repeated the same routine he had done on the previous seven nights, but he was more careful.
At twelve, he opened the door and slowly let himself in. This night, the old man felt there was someone in his room. The narrator patiently waited, and when he shed light into the old man's eye he saw it open and felt his anger increasing.
As he started to hear the old man's heart beating, his anger turned into fear and quickly moved into his victim, tightly holding the bed covers over him. Just before the murder is consumed, he smiled as he felt he was succeeding.
Then, he carefully hid the body and calmly received the police officers. Because of his behavior, he was able to convince them that the old man was not there, until he started to hear the heart beat again. In the end, he couldn't stand his suffering and confessed his crime.
Answer:
This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:
After reading a novel set and written during the English Civil War, you are tasked with writing a literary criticism of the work. Which approach would be the most fitting?
A. Reader-response
B. Biographical
C. Ecocriticism
D. New Historicism
Explanation:
The correct answer is option D. New Historicism.
Neohistoricism follows the idea that a text should be considered as something that comes from a time, place, and from the way it was written, and not as a specific type of text.
Here an attempt was made to understand a history from its provenance, the time in which it developed, understanding the culture from which it comes and an intellectual analysis through literature.
Given this information, we can say that the correct answer is option D.
