Neolithic revolution is called the first radical transformation of the way of life of humanity, which goes from being nomadic to sedentary and having a collecting economy (hunting, fishing and gathering) to producer (agriculture and livestock).
This process took place more than 9000 years ago (VIII millennium BC) in response to the climate crisis that occurred at the beginning of the Holocene, after the last glaciation and which, in terms related to the history of culture, corresponds to the passage of the Paleolithic period (carved stone) to the Neolithic (new stone) and hence its name. In the first place, it affected the wide area that, due to its appearance on the map, has received the name of fertile crescent or fertile crescent. It includes from the Egyptian part of the valley of the Nile to Mesopotamia (the territory between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers), passing through the coastal strip of the Mediterranean Levante and the mountainous region of southeastern Turkey. Within it, the places where the oldest archaeological evidence of neolithization has been found, that is, the substitution of the stone carved by the polished stone for making weapons and tools, do not come precisely from the alluvial plains of the great rivers, but of deposits located in a narrower area around them (Jericho or Chatal Huyuk). This is not strange, since in the alluvial plains of the Nile, the Tigris and Euphrates, the stone is scarcer.
The abolitionist newspaper "The liberator" looked at slavery from the point of view slaves.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The abolitionist newspaper The liberator was publishes by William Llyod Garrison from Boston and he is known to be one of the radical abolitionists and demanded immediate emancipation of all the slaves.The newspaper denounced Kansas-Nebraska Act and denounced the compromise of 1850.
"The liberator"looked at slavery from the point of view of a slave and fought for their liberation and challenged the position of slave owners in the south.
Answer:
its either Boston, New York or Philadelphia
After the British takeover of the New Netherlands, the control of the entire economic and political affairs went into the hands of the English Crown.
<h3>What is the significance of the British takeover of the New Netherlands?</h3>
The British gained a control over the New Netherlands in the second half of the seventeenth century. After this takeover, there was complete transfer of the control of economic and political affairs of the society.
The event of the British takeover of the New Netherlands was led by Richard Nicholls at the New York Harbor. The Dutch readily gave the control in the British hands, avoiding a fight.
Hence, the significance of the British takeover of the New Netherlands is aforementioned.
Learn more about the British takeover of the New Netherlands here:
brainly.com/question/1498757
#SPJ1
Answer:A central issue at the Convention was whether the federal government or the states would have more power. Many delegates believed that the federal government should be able to overrule state laws, but others feared that a strong federal government would oppress their citizens.
Explanation:
