An EF5 on the Fujita scale is the largest and therefore causes the greatest damage.
<span><span>As for the responder, science study as much as it can
process. Though there are certain principles, theories and laws needed to
determine one is truly science. It needs to undergo the scientific method to
analyze and gather evidential data and in addition this study should be
replicable in the process. Replicable is one strong characteristic of a study
that can intensify the reliability and validity of the field. And what science
doesn’t study is not until the principles apply to the aforementioned
statement. Science can study and wants to understand everything or in as much
as the broader scope of each phenomenon, it’s some concepts that are just very
hard to gather data, and studies like the metaphysical and paranormal that can’t
be repeated. These limitations inhibit scientists to draw data that is reliable
and valid, thus, science. </span> </span>
Answer;
-Over 4000
Mathematically, the biomass in the ocean contributes over 4000 times more grams of NPP per year per gram than an equivalent gram of plant biomass in a terrestrial ecosystem.
Explanation;
-Living biomass forms a tiny fraction of Total Ocean carbon but has a very significant influence on the ocean carbon cycle. Every gram of biomass of the primary producers in the ocean contributes more to NPP per year than plant biomass of terrestrial ecosystems.
-In marine ecosystems, phytoplankton is the main source of primary production. The nutrient availability cycles make it important to distinguish between new and regenerated primary production ; the former identifies the annually renewed nitrogen, while the second measures the rapid cycling of nitrogen through ammonia availability.
