“That the subjects . . . may have arms for their defense” is the right listed in the English Bill of Rights and is the basis for the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.
<h3>What the second amendment ensures?</h3>
The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads: "A nicely regulated Militia, being vital to the safety of a free State, the rights of the humans to preserve and endure Arms, shall now no longer be infringed."
The amendment was created in more hostile times to guarantee people and states' right to self-defense, and it enables US residents to keep and bear arms for such purposes.
The missing information in the question is given below:
“that levying money for or to the use of the Crown . . . without grant of Parliament . . . is illegal” “that it is the right of the subjects to petition the king” “That the raising or keeping a standing army . . . unless it is with consent of Parliament, is against law” “That the subjects . . . may have arms for their defense”
Thus, “That the subjects . . . may have arms for their defense” is the right listed in the English Bill of Rights and is the basis for the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.
Learn more about second amendment:
brainly.com/question/1750552
#SPJ1
Answer:
the angel (because they believed it was what god wanted), people traveling (because they believed god wanted them to expand the country's territory) and maybe the houses cause it shows them settling down
Explanation:
Hope this helps
The founding Fathers knew that the single most important and hard task of the government is keeping the economy safe or defining it.
A <span>failure to improve transportation would have affected the economic and social development of the nation in that it would have made it more costly and more cumbersome to move both people and products within a market--which would have cost companies money and therefore reduced overall US GDP. </span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not specify if you mean all kinds of monuments or some monuments in specific.
If your question is for all monuments in general, the answer is no. Monuments represent important moments in the history of the country or exhibit important historical figures that have forged the identity of the nation. Their public exhibition is a positive to remember those people or events with respect.
Now, on the other hand, if you are referring to the confederate monuments, this is a controversial issue that has divided the country after the death of African American George Floyd.
Like it or not, the Civil War and the Confederate side were part of the United States history and represent something of meaning for white people in the South. Unfortunately, this page of the US story is related to slavery and racism, both elements that have hurt and dive the country. So many Americans have demanded the removal of these monuments from public places such as schools, college campuses, and parks.
As controversial as it could sound, we can consider that the removal of the monuments could divide even more American society.
