Answer:
Each new step in science reconciles twenty seemingly discordant facts as merely the various manifestations of a single principle.
Explanation:
Even though the only context we have is the sentence itself, we can safely choose number 2. This type of sentence is used when we wish to present contrasting ideas. There would be no reason, for example, for science to unify what is already harmonious, or to undermine what is already erroneous. Those ideas are redundant. It makes much more sense to say that science reconciles facts that are seemingly discordant. That is the wonder in science: to see different things as the manifestations of a single principle, which could seem, if science did not exist, impossible.
Answer:
He would have died!
Explanation:
It's kind of obvious what would have happened to him (no offense :) ).
Therefore, I have no more to say.
Have a nice day! :)
1) because of culture, there might be different religion practices and worships. this could affect the partners to look in the same direction when believing in something.
D. by challenging accepted principles wollstone craft was one of the first proponents of women's rights
