Answer:
PROS
1. Mandatory Voting Would Increase Voter Turnout
2 Compulsory Voting Would Change Campaigning for the Better
3. Compulsory Voting Would Encourage Engagement in the Political Process
4.Compulsory Voting Would Encourage Informed Voting
5. Mandatory Voting Would Discourage Polarization
CONS
1.Compulsory Voting Would Encourage an Uninformed Electorate
2. Compulsory Voting Would Hamper Freedom of Choice
3.It Would Be a Burden to Law Enforcement
4. Compulsory Voting Could Decrease Interest in the Issues
5. Mandatory Voting Would Steer Candidates Away From Their Base
hope this helps
They did not want to separate from the church
Answer:
Iraq invaded Iran on 22 September 1980, triggering a bitter eight-year war which destabilised the region and devastated both countries. The then Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein claimed as a reason for the invasion a territorial dispute over the Shatt al-Arab, the waterway which forms the boundary between the two countries.
Explanation:
Back then, the anti-Catholics believed that Catholicism was not compatible with democracy.
They believe that Catholicism kept the people who followed it from becoming loyal Americans
hope this helps
"Communism" was not a change in policy created by Gorbachev.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
A Russian, former Soviet politician, 8th, last leader of the Soviet Union, positioned the general secretary of its communist party from the period 1985 - 1991 popular known as "Mikhail S. Gorbachev".
Understanding the historical and more recent relevance of the world in 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev and his advisers embraced "glasnost" as a political slogan along with the elusive "perestroika".
Glasnost has been taken as factor for increased lack of secrecy and transparency in Soviet Union government entities and activities. Therefore communism was not a variation in policy established by M.S. Gorbachev.
