1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aneli [31]
3 years ago
6

PLEASE HELP, 10 POINTS IF YOU'RE RIGHT, IM TIMED

Mathematics
2 answers:
kramer3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

It is D because 8 3/5 is 8.6 in decimal form which is also right in between 9 and 8 which they are very close to 8.6. So there is not an exact number

Sladkaya [172]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is D....... between 8 and 9.

You might be interested in
D= number of dollars
padilas [110]

<u>Unit rate 4:</u>

The table

d      n

4       1

8       2

16      4

<u>Unit rate 1/4:</u>

Table

d      n

1       4

4       16

16      64

and

The equation n=4d

<u>Unit rate 16:</u>

Equation:

d = 16n

Step-by-step explanation:

The unit in the unit rate is dollars per unit ounces which means that the unit rate calculated by

Unit\ rate = \frac{dollars}{ounces}

So,

The first option is the equation:

d = 16n\\\frac{d}{n} = 16

The unit rate is 16 dollars per ounce

The second option is the table:

d      n

1       4

4       16

16      64

We can take any pair of values of d and n from the table to calculate the unit rate

So taking

d = 1

n=4

Unit\ rate = \frac{d}{n}\\= \frac{1}{4}

The unit rate for table is: 1/4 dollars per ounces

Third option is the equation:

n = 4d

n = 4d

dividing both sides by n

\frac{n}{n} = \frac{4d}{n}\\1 = \frac{4d}{n}

dividing both sides by 4

\frac{1}{4} = \frac{4d}{4n}\\\frac{d}{n} = \frac{1}{4}

the unit rate is 1/4 dollars per ounce

Fourth option is the table:

d      n

4       1

8       2

16      4

We will take any pair of d and n to find the unit rate

So,

Taking

d = 4

n =1

Unit\ rate = \frac{d}{n} \\= \frac{4}{1}\\=4

The unit rate is 4 dollars per unit ounce.

Keywords: Unit rate, units

Learn more about unit rate at:

  • brainly.com/question/4550858
  • brainly.com/question/4639731

#LearnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
Note: Enter your answer and show all the steps that you use to solve this problem in the space provided.
BabaBlast [244]

Answer: 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Pythagorean theorem - a^2+b^2=c^2

a^2+15^2=17^2

a^2+225=289

(subtract 225 from both sides)

a^2=64

(sq root both sides)

a=8

6 0
3 years ago
How do you make 4 an 1/2 a decimal
Tatiana [17]
1/2 is the same as .5 and 4 is a whole number, so the decimal form would be 4.5
5 0
4 years ago
Nineteen immigrants to the U.S. were asked how many years, to the nearest year, they have lived in the U.S. The data are as foll
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

a) The frequency of the data "<em>15</em>" and "<em>20</em>" is 2 for both, not 1; this means their relative frequency is 2/19 for both, not 1/19; finally, the cumulative relative frequency in the row of the data "15" should be 0.8947, not 0.8421. This error might have happened because someone didn't count the numbers correctly, so they only noticed one "15" and one "20" when, in fact, there were two people that had lived in the U.S. for 15 years, and two more people for 20 years. On the other hand, the error in the cumulative relative frequency happened because it accounted for only one person living in the U.S. for 15 years, instead of two people.

b) Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. from 0 to 5 years, <em>not </em>for 5 years. The cumulative relative frequency in this row (47%) accounts for every data gathered so far, not just the "5 years" row. The correct statement would be that <em>3 out of 19</em>, or 15.8% (relative frequency) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) First of all, to avoid errors like the one in the problem's table, <em>we should first place the given numbers from least to greatest</em>, so we can construct a new frequency table by ourselves. Let's do just that, and we'll end up with something like this:

0 , 0, 2 , 2, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 10, 10, 12, 12 , 15, 15, 20, 20

Now we'll have a much easier time from now on.

2) The second step is to <em>construct the Data and Frequency columns</em>. Just place each unique integer in a new row of the <em>Data </em>column, then count how many times that unique integer was found, and, finally, place that number below the <em>Frequency </em>column (<em>Please refer to the Excel Worksheet provided as an attachment). </em>

Let's do it as follows:

Data     Frequency

0            2

2            3

4            1

5            3

7            2

10           2

12           2

15           2

20          2

<em>Note that we counted "15" and "20" twice! So each one of those rows have a frequency of 2, not 1 as the table presented in the problem suggests. </em>

3) Next, we want to construct the Relative frequency and Cumulative relative frequency columns. For the relative frequency column, <em>we just divide the frequency of each row by the total number of immigrants surveyed, which is 19</em>. For the cumulative relative frequency column, <em>we will get each row's relative frequency, and add the cumulative relative frequency of the row before it</em>. Note that for the first row, the cumulative relative frequency is the same as its relative frequency.

We should get something like this:

Data    Frequency    Relative frequency    Cumulative relative frequency

0            2                   2/19                               0.1053

2            3                   3/19                               0.2632

4            1                    1/19                                0.3158

5            3                   3/19                               0.4737

7            2                   2/19                               0.5789

10           2                   2/19                               0.6842

12           2                   2/19                               0.7895

15           2                   2/19                               0.8947

20          2                   2/19                               1.0000

<em>Note that the relative frequency for both "15" and "20" is 2/19 instead of 1/19! Also, we got a cumulative relative frequency of 0.8947 in the row of "15", instead of 0.8421.</em>

4) a) We have just fixed the error in the table, but we have to <em>explain how someone might have arrived at the incorrect number(s)</em>. The most logical way that someone might have gotten the incorrect frequencies of "15" and "20" is that <em>they didn't count the numbers correctly while building the Frequency column</em>. This could have happened because <em>that person probably didn't order the numbers from least to greatest</em>, as we did in Step 1, which makes it way easier to get the frequency of each data without making a mistake.

5) b) We have now to <em>explain what is wrong with the statement "47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years</em>.

To answer that, we can refer to the relative frequency of the row of the data "5", which tells us that 3 out of 19 (or roughly 15.8%) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years. <em>Relative frequency is telling us the percentage of people that have lived for </em><em>this </em><em>amount of time.</em>

By contrast, <em>the cumulative relative frequency of this same row tells us that </em>0.4737, or roughly 47%, of the people surveyed have lived for 5 years or less. Cumulative relative frequency accounts for the data presented in its row, <em>plus </em>the data presented in the rows before it.

So the correct statement would be either:

  • 15.8% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years, or
  • Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years or less.
Download xlsx
7 0
4 years ago
Help Plssssssaaa s s s
3241004551 [841]
It should be 50(x+5). Let me know if you want more of an explanation.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 6.578 round to the nearest tenth
    13·2 answers
  • Using the diagram, which two planes would hg intersect in ?
    9·2 answers
  • Using the technique in the model above, find the missing sides in this 30° 600-90 right triangle.longShort 7Hypotenuse3.571314
    14·1 answer
  • the sum of two numbers is 105 if the larger number is 13 more than the smaller number find both sumbers
    5·2 answers
  • Can someone please help me on this find the value of y
    6·1 answer
  • Determine if the lines are parallel, perpendicular, or neither.<br><br> 10x + 5y =-5 and y = -2x + 6
    15·1 answer
  • I need help finding X, I don't remember how to do this, haven't done it in a while lol
    15·1 answer
  • Which is more 8.83 or 8.9
    12·2 answers
  • During the fall, you decide to rake leaves and charge $12 for coming to a house and raking, and then $9 for every hour you rake.
    8·1 answer
  • Espanol
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!