Answer:
when we assume the other person knows how we feel or what we are trying to say
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not include the name of the article, the link to it, or any further reference, doing some research we can comment on the following.
Nathan Thornburg's position on immigration is the following.
He considers that the United States federal government has to assume a definite posture on the issue of immigration that still affects the country. In his article of 2007 titled "A Case for Amnesty," Thornburg questions the way some politicians have approached the complicated issue of immigration, the consequences for the country, and the affectation of many immigrants.
He cites some examples such as the posture of the late Republican Senator John McCain.
The point of Thornburg is that the Amnesty bill could have positive political consequences for the American government, and somehow alleviate the flux of immigration to the United States.
Nathan Thornburg is a Senior Editor for "Time" magazine, and has published other important articles such as "Dropout Nation."
Taking into consideration the natural stress that each word has, we can easily identify the stress patter in this line. First, we start with those words which have more than one syllable, and identify the stress pattern within them.
FORty
WINters
beSIEGE
In the context of the sentence, they look like this:
when FORty WINters shall beSIEGE by you.
The words <em><u>for</u>ty<u> win</u>ters </em>are the clue here as they establish a pattern of stressed+unstressed that can be used for the rest of the sentence.
when FORty WINters SHALL beSIEGE by YOU.
Therefore, your best answer is option B.
Answer:
gods that they are more powerful than the human that they should have the right to control the little humans
