Answer:
Explanation:
Clarity. Complex words and syntax are a hindrance to clarity and should be avoided. ...
Don't describe each and every one of your own movements. ...
Avoid the second-person narrative. ...
To interest the reader, dynamic word choice is key. ...
Limit references.
Answer:
B). "He found that children and adults who have read stories their whole lives were more likely to correctly identify the feelings and thoughts of others than those who do not read regularly."
C). "Trying to understand these characters exercises the same mental muscle that helps us understand people in the real world."
Explanation:
The above two evidence factually support and substantiate the claim that 'people who read stories are better at communicating and understanding the feelings of others.'
The first evidence i.e. option B states that <u>the research revealed 'the children or adults who have been reading stories constantly their whole lives are able to recognize the thoughts or feelings of others more accurately' while the second evidence i.e. option C asserts logically that 'in attempt to understand the characters of stories, the same mental muscle is required for understanding people in real life.'</u>
Thus, these two pieces of evidence not only support but substantiates how reading comprehends our understanding of thoughts, opinions, or feelings of others. Hence, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
Answer:
look below!
Explanation:
Can cause addiction
May worry or scare someone
Might hack your personal information
Answer:
The narrator in Blake's "The Tyger" expresses:
D. disturbed awe.
Explanation:
The speaker in William Blake's poem "The Tyger" is in awe of the tiger. He fears and admires the tiger at the same time. The animal's aura is filled with terror and wonder. It was made to kill. Its pace, it gaze, all of it shows how terrible it is. Yet, it was created by God, just like the innocent and harmless lamb. That is what disturbs the speaker the most. How can the same creator come up with such different creatures? One that is a natural murderer, and one that is completely meek? Having that in mind, we can say the narrator in the poem expresses D. disturbed awe.
