1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastasy [175]
3 years ago
12

So can someone write a brief summary, about two to three paragraphs about the inauguration of 2021 and how the law enforcement s

topped the group of people from two weeks ago who stormed the capitol? And could you list like a video or an article where you found the information too pls? Thank you!!!
Law
2 answers:
cluponka [151]3 years ago
6 0
Answer :
On January 6, 2021 a large riot had gathered and stormed the capitol building to protest against the presidency. At the same time as the rioters were entering the capitol building, congress and lawmakers were inside counting the votes for this past election. The capitol were not prepared for the rioting, and had little law enforcement there to stop such a large group.

As the rioters walked up the steps of the building, officers were there trying to resist the group, but didn’t have the manpower necessary. This led to the people being able to overpower law enforcement and walk into the building, forcing their way into the capitol. Reinforcement was called, the national guard showing up a while after, and standing on guard to keep watch on the capitol building after the fact.
Natali5045456 [20]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

I agree with Zadieriver

You might be interested in
Describe a situation where two different people might perceive a crime scene in different ways.
puteri [66]

Answer:

a mur*** that can be seen as a suici** some people may think it was a mur*** some think it looks like a suici**.

7 0
1 year ago
Which is true about criminal law?
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

The statement that is true about criminal law is It involves wrongs against society.

Explanation:

Lets use process of elimination!

The first sentence states It provides the injured party with a remedy.

This would be personal injury case, not a criminal case.

The second sentence states It involves wrongs against individuals.

This would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.

The third sentence states It tries to return the injured party to the same position before injury.

This again would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.

Which leaves the fourth and final sentence. It states It involves wrongs against society.

This is the correct answer because if you did something to an individual, it would be a civil matter, but the wrongs against society would be like commiting a homicide, robery, grand theft, assult, arson, kidnapping, etc.

Hopefully this helps!!

Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!

5 0
2 years ago
Zapoznaj się z zamieszczonymi niżej danymi i określ, czy zdania A–C są prawdziwe.
SVEN [57.7K]
Zapoznaj się z zamieszczonymi niżej danymi i określ, czy zdania A–C są prawdziwe.
Źródło: Korzystanie z internetu, Komunikat z badań CBOS, Warszawa, kwiecień 2017.

W Polsce coraz więcej osób korzysta z urządzeń przenośnych służących do łączenia się z internetem.
Na podstawie wykresu można sformułować opinię, że Polacy są społeczeństwem informacyjnym.
Ponad połowa Polaków mogła się łączyć internetem za pomocą urządzeń przenośnych już w 2010 r.
Odszukaj, korzystając z dowolnego medium, informację o tym, ile osób w Polsce posiada telefon komórkowy, laptop, tablet.
Podyskutujcie w klasie o tym, czy potrzebne są zasady etyczne w internecie.
Wyjaśnij, na czym polega zasada zachowania tajemnicy źródła informacji. Dlaczego jest ona ważna?
7 0
2 years ago
What happens when unlimited wants exceed limited productive resources?
tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

Limited resources. Unlimited wants. The Economics of Seinfeld says the following regarding the term: “Unlimited wants essentially mean that people never get enough, that there is always something else that they would like to have.” “When combined with limited resources, unlimited wants result in the fundamental problem of scarcity.”

6 0
3 years ago
Why would a police officer need to know the bill of rights?
Hunter-Best [27]

Hi!

Police officers would need to know about bill of rights so that they make sure that they are being fair during an arrest, or any other police duty. For example, the first amendment of the bill of rights states that everyone should have freedom of religion, speech and press. An officer can NOT arrest a person who is giving a speech to fellow people about how he/she feels about the nation/government, because of the first amendment.

Hope this helps! Have a wonderful day/night! :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Aside from a target, who else can be impacted by online cruelty? Who else could be involved, implicitly or explicitly?
    8·1 answer
  • Ms. Lewis understands that Medicare prescription drug plans may use various methods to control the use of specific drugs. She ha
    9·2 answers
  • Is the company LegalShield available in all of the USA including Alaska?
    13·1 answer
  • Title VIII of the Education Act of 1972 prohibits gender discrimination in all elementary and secondary schools, colleges, and u
    9·1 answer
  • A citizen can use deadly force in order to prevent the commission of all following crimes with the exception of :
    11·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    6·2 answers
  • 3.
    7·1 answer
  • Things about justice
    14·2 answers
  • ***50 Points*** (Wraith Actual) (Part 1)
    11·1 answer
  • Explain the ways a citizen can participate in the affairs of their country​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!