Answer:
a mur*** that can be seen as a suici** some people may think it was a mur*** some think it looks like a suici**.
Answer:
The statement that is true about criminal law is It involves wrongs against society.
Explanation:
Lets use process of elimination!
The first sentence states It provides the injured party with a remedy.
This would be personal injury case, not a criminal case.
The second sentence states It involves wrongs against individuals.
This would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.
The third sentence states It tries to return the injured party to the same position before injury.
This again would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.
Which leaves the fourth and final sentence. It states It involves wrongs against society.
This is the correct answer because if you did something to an individual, it would be a civil matter, but the wrongs against society would be like commiting a homicide, robery, grand theft, assult, arson, kidnapping, etc.
Hopefully this helps!!
Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!
Zapoznaj się z zamieszczonymi niżej danymi i określ, czy zdania A–C są prawdziwe.
Źródło: Korzystanie z internetu, Komunikat z badań CBOS, Warszawa, kwiecień 2017.
W Polsce coraz więcej osób korzysta z urządzeń przenośnych służących do łączenia się z internetem.
Na podstawie wykresu można sformułować opinię, że Polacy są społeczeństwem informacyjnym.
Ponad połowa Polaków mogła się łączyć internetem za pomocą urządzeń przenośnych już w 2010 r.
Odszukaj, korzystając z dowolnego medium, informację o tym, ile osób w Polsce posiada telefon komórkowy, laptop, tablet.
Podyskutujcie w klasie o tym, czy potrzebne są zasady etyczne w internecie.
Wyjaśnij, na czym polega zasada zachowania tajemnicy źródła informacji. Dlaczego jest ona ważna?
Answer:
Limited resources. Unlimited wants. The Economics of Seinfeld says the following regarding the term: “Unlimited wants essentially mean that people never get enough, that there is always something else that they would like to have.” “When combined with limited resources, unlimited wants result in the fundamental problem of scarcity.”
Hi!
Police officers would need to know about bill of rights so that they make sure that they are being fair during an arrest, or any other police duty. For example, the first amendment of the bill of rights states that everyone should have freedom of religion, speech and press. An officer can NOT arrest a person who is giving a speech to fellow people about how he/she feels about the nation/government, because of the first amendment.
Hope this helps! Have a wonderful day/night! :)