The Sherman act is your answer
My opinion about this situation is that the police are not at fault because they should have all the necessary resources to intervene in these situations, but that is a state matter that they do not control.
Housebreaking is a criminal practice in which an individual enters a house, apartment, or private property without the consent of the owner or the person in charge of the same and extracts valuables or attacks those who live there.
This crime requires the intervention of police officers because they have the training and the necessary tools to stop this event and bring the criminals to a judge.
However, on some occasions, the police officers do not have the necessary resources (defense weapons, cars, gasoline for the car, uniforms, among others) to intervene in these situations so they refrain from doing so since an intervention without some elements could cause damage to their physical integrity.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/13048987
Answer:
I believe the answer to 1. is B, and Grare decisis means substantially the same. Basically based on a court's previous decision in a case, that same decision can be carried out and used in any future cases.
Explanation:
Answer:
Another way to say "literal interpretation" is strict interpretation. I believe that the democrats, headed by Jefferson in the early 1800s, followed strict interpretation, even though he followed loose interpretation when he purchased the louisiana territory.
If I’m not wrong, there’s a table of standard deviations that will tell you the critical value
