Answer:
pre-twentieth-century, East Coast, urban gangs in the United States
Explanation:
Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Many European nations offer government services that are not offered in the United States. In order to do this, they require their citizens to pay higher taxes. The United States doesn't follow the same system because in Europe the governments invest in offering affordable services to the citizens, trying to consider the necessities of the poor. There are social programs aimed to facilitate health services and other services so much needed for the medium and low class.
In the United States, many services are seen as a business, Private companies offer the services but as a business to make a profit, not thinking about the necessities of less favored or poor. Depending on the political party in power, sometimes there are social programs to help the people, as in the case of the Democratic administration that raises more taxes to fund these programs. On the other hand, when the Republicans run the government, they do not like to raise more taxes to fund social programs. They think that people have to pay for the services they need.
