Answer:
4.The answer is B
Explanation:I DID THE ASSIGNMENT ITS B
1) It was quite necessary not only for Buck, but also for others struggling to survive in the wild North. If he hadn't killed Spitz it it could have been very dangerous for others because he was very aggressive due to the hunger. Even though he was the leader, blinded by hunger he could do anything to survive, forgetting about the rest of dogs.
2) If he hadn't died he could have get many other innocent lives, like he had done to Curley. This character yielded to the external conflict of the harsh wild conditions, and his instings were much more powerful than his sense of justice so he could have bring harm until he reached his own safety.
What are some things that interest you?Maybe i can help :)
I believe that the answer is D. The general purpose of the speech is that you provide an argument for a topic with your support and provide counters to the counter arguments for the topic itself. Your main purpose should be to prove the audience believe that you are correct in what you are explaining and talking about.
Need the answers to be able to reply
