1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inessa [10]
3 years ago
9

(BRAINLYIST AND 20 POINTS)Rank the following in order of their importance to the american victory, with 1 as the most important

and 3 as the least important. You will be able to justify your choices.
1. Political factors (foreign alliances)

2. Military Factors (strength and leadership)

3. Economic (money to fund the war)

(if you dont understand what to do heres the work sheet
History
1 answer:
kolbaska11 [484]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:1) political factors

2)Military factors

3)Economic

Explanation:

1) I think the political factors played an important role. Specially, by the alliance with France. France provided the money, troops, armament, military leadership, and naval support that tipped the balance of military power in favor of the United States. Other colonial countries like Spain also supported them which paved the way to their victory.

3) I think economic cause is less important, because the British had a fair war founding, too, yet they couldn't hold victory.Again, The Americans didn't have a poor funding . So war funding isn't the biggest factor here.

You might be interested in
I’ll give brainliest!!
sergeinik [125]
The question is in relation to producing an abundance in the means of living e.g. shelter, food and clothing. Before capitalism became a global system humankind were always confronted with the constant problem of producing sufficient products so there was a surplus and then distributing these surplus products in order to survive. Natural scarcity was to all intents and circumstances the order of the day. Whole communities and civilisations could be wiped out through climate change, flooding, famine or depletion in natural resources, etc; due to this lack of surplus products.

Humankind, was constantly under pressure to adapt to the changing conditions and circumstances. However, with food always in high demand we found through trial and error a stable community based on agriculture was a partial solution to the problem of obtaining a surplus in food. The introduction of agriculture meant a further division of labour with specialists and a communal store becoming an established feature of such societies.

The first settled agricultural communities would have been established by societies which had previously practised hunting and gathering and so had a communistic economic structure. This was characterised by the absence of private ownership of the means of production and by the sharing of products according to need. After the adoption of agriculture, these communistic economic arrangements survived for a while, but tended to break down in the long run as they no longer corresponded to the material conditions of production.

This was not yet the establishment of private ownership, but it meant the end of free access to the means of production that had obtained in hunter-gatherer societies. It ruled out any member of society simply helping themselves to the products of any plot of land. Normally they would only have free access to the products of the plot cultivated by the family unit to which they belonged.

The existence of a common store becomes another aspect of the society's material conditions of production and requires a social arrangement for managing this store -collecting and distributing the surpluses. The usual arrangement seems to have been to confer this responsibility on a particular family. This role of collecting and redistributing surpluses had to be filled if all the members of the community were able to meet their basic needs as of right.

The emergence of control over means of production by a section of society, or social class, was a radical departure in human social arrangements. Production was no longer controlled by society as a whole. Such societies ceased to be communities with a common interest and became divided, with one class, on the basis of its control over access to and use of the material forces of production, exploiting the productive work of the other class and allocating itself a privileged consumption.

After the rise of settled townships on an agricultural base in Mesopotamia, trade between localities developed. For the first time the products of hands and brains took on an alien life as commodities to be bartered, and then bought and sold with the abstract commodity of money. Property, released at the boundary between tribes, began to impinge within them. The first property society came to be developed when people were bought and sold as slaves.

For the sake of brevity we’ll skip the introduction of feudalism and go straight to capitalism. Capitalist social relations emerged with the expropriation of common land by the aristocracy in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The lands were enclosed to be used for sheep farming rather than arable cultivation. One reason for this was that the new Flemish woollen industry made sheep more profitable tenants than peasants. Enclosure destroyed the lives of thousands of peasant families, turning them into propertyless vagabonds.

Deprived of their land, their homes, their traditional surroundings and the protection of the law, the expropriated peasants were left to sell the one thing they possessed -their ability to work. The introduction of wage labour was the starting point of capitalism. Wage labour=profits=artificial scarcity.

With the introduction of artificial scarcity the problem of surplus production was solved by capitalism. Nonetheless, the problem of distribution still remains due to the restrictions of the profit system. In a nutshell despite the huge amounts of wealth produced by capitalism global resources can only be freed up with the introduction of common ownership.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a responsibility of the vice president?
nikklg [1K]
The Vice President cannot Veto acts of Congress.
5 0
3 years ago
Believed minority education was the key to gaining equality.<br>please help me quick thanks
Nady [450]

Booker T Washington

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
From The Walking Dead:
Schach [20]

Answer:

I think its the third one or the first

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which factors helped the independence movements of Latin America in the early 1800s? Select the best answer from the choices pro
ExtremeBDS [4]
Idk but ok how you feel
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Due to the Columbian Exchange, Europeans brought diseases such as the flu and common cold to the Americas, which resulted in mil
    15·1 answer
  • Why did nethaniel bacon and his followers attack jamestown?
    6·1 answer
  • How did farming influence settlement patters in America
    15·1 answer
  • What was NOT associated with the 'New Immigrants' who came to the United States after the Civil War?
    7·1 answer
  • What is one way the Treaty of Versailles affected Germany after World War I?
    13·1 answer
  • How has the quality of the food we eat changed since the agricultural revolution?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the legacy of the writings of anne frank?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the function of the crop in birds?
    7·2 answers
  • Help me it’s due today!
    7·1 answer
  • How are the current federal court system originated ?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!