Answer:
European nations wanted to control lands that had raw materials for industry and manufacturing.
Explanation:
The Europeans focus on expanding their market and crave for more raw materials which are cheaper compared to other countries.The Africa became dependent to European imperialism.
The nations of Germany and the United States
David Livingstone was a Scottish missionary, explorer, and anti-slavery advocate. He embarked upon several missions into Africa, venturing farther into the interior than previous European explorers. While trying to find the source of the Nile River, he became ill in what is now northern Zambia. After his death in 1873, Livingstone’s heart was removed and buried in the African soi
Answer:
Explanation:
This is tough and requires a level of interpretation. I will refer to the modifications in the box as 1-3 in the order they are listed and the possible answers I will refer as a-d in the order they are listed. Lets analyze:
First the question; it's asking us, based on 1-3, which one of a-d are the most true to answer the question, "why did the colonist modify the environment?"
I will start with what is most false and work to find our answer. B is not the answer. Nothing in 1, 2, or 3 applies specifically to protection.
C is not the best choice. While 1 and 3 could apply, 2 simply does not.
D is a tough one. It could be argued that the impact of all 3 answers are to encourage development of the trade we with England, but that is relying on outside information not provided to us. The statements 1, 2 and 3 have no specific mention of britain or trading.
That leaves A. 1 says clearing forests for lumber. Lumber is an economic good. 2 is also a economic good. 3 applies to transportation of goods as well as the town's that are needed for people to live and trade goods and services.
I believe answer A is the best choice.