It takes up half the country
on the map, and a special place
in the consciousness of Canadians.
Rugged and unconquerable, the Shield
is a challenge -- a good challenge
for a people to have in their midst...
He should write it to the governor...I think
The war would be prolonged for couple of years and there would be more casualties, but still the Central Powers would be defeated.
Explanation:
- Due to the heavy losses and unfavorable balance of forces, the Central Powers decided in 1917 to launch a strategic attack on the mainland.
- At the same time, the Germans resorted to an unrestricted submarine war, which began on II. 1917 The war on the side of the Entente entered the 6th IV. 1917 The United States, which since the beginning of the war has been more supportive of the Entente and aided it.
- Despite the strong isolationist current, the US government decided to go to war because it feared the victory of German imperialism, which was striving for world domination.
- German submarines ruthlessly sunk American ships, which outraged American public opinion and was a direct cause for US declaration of war by the Central Powers.
Learn more on WW1 on
brainly.com/question/406361
brainly.com/question/50184
brainly.com/question/858969
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
The North largely thought new states ought to be free, while the South largely thought those states ought to choose for themselves (which, in many cases, would likely lead to more slave states).
Explanation:
I don't know
Answer:
No they don't, he regularly alludes to them as "uncouth" and requests that they be removed from their general public.
Explanation:
Morals and style topple over in favor of relativism in Virginia. "Countries raised to freedom and to decision themselves consider some other type of government colossal and in spite of nature. Those familiar with government do likewise". Montaigne relates the reality without condemning it: his long experience has instructed him that all judgment is nevertheless the declaration of propensity; thusly, nothing licenses him to assert that freedom is a decent, and its nonattendance a shrewdness; to esteem freedom would be confirmation of ethnocentrism, and to mask propensity as all inclusive reason. This would be significantly more apparent with regards to judgments about excellence: who couldn't refer to a few precedents outlining the insecurity of the human perfect? "It is likely that we know minimal about what excellence is in nature and by and large, since to our own human magnificence we give such a large number of various structures".
