Ten times greater than 6.6*10^10 and 3*10^7
Answer:
It is the second one (It's decreasing by five feet per hour.)
Step-by-step explanation:
Thanks for the points!
Stay safe and healthy!
Happy holiday seasons!
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
8, 13, 21
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a part of the Fibonacci sequence. it is where you add the two previous numbers together to get the third.
<u><em>Ex. </em></u>
<u><em>1+1 = 2</em></u>
<u><em>1+2 = 3</em></u>
Answer:3/8
Step-by-step explanation: