Answer: They forced the government to address problems.
Explanation:
1. Fujimori is elected president of Peru.
2. Fujimori tries to solve the economic crisis but runs into many obstacles.
3. Fujimiori dissolves Congress and say the Constitution can be ignored.
4. Fujimiori uses tanks and tear gas to stop Congress from meeting.
5. Fujimiori successfully solves the economic problems and terrorism troubles in Peru.
6. Scandal breaks out over illegal activity in Fujimori's government.
7. President Fujimori flees to Japan.
8. Fujimori is sentenced to a total of 31 years in prison.
Answer:Manifest Destiny, in U.S. history, the supposed inevitability of the continued territorial expansion of the boundaries of the United States westward to the Pacific and beyond. Before the American Civil War (1861–65), the idea of Manifest Destiny was used to validate continental acquisitions in the Oregon Country, Texas, New Mexico, and California. The purchase of Alaska after the Civil War briefly revived the concept of Manifest Destiny, but it most evidently became a renewed force in U.S. foreign policy in the 1890s, when the country went to war with Spain, annexed Hawaii, and laid plans for an isthmian canal across Central America.
Answer: It is a set of actions taken by interest groups on issues that relate to the economy.
Explanation: An economic policy is when there is a course of action intended to control or influence the economy's behavior. (Like being told as a kid to not run down the hallway or else you'll get hurt.)
If there's an economic downturn in a country where the taxes are very high, and those taxes are used for the funding of the numerous social programs, than the country can very quickly face high rates of poverty and maybe even an internal conflict.
If the economy suddenly starts to crumble, the people that work would not be able to support themselves with the paying of very high taxes, thus they will rebel against that in order for the taxes to be lowered down.
On the other hand, that will result in little to no funding for the social programs. That will bring in revolt in the people that are very poor and need those programs, but also the people that do not work by their will but have relied on those money.
These two sides of the picture can easily bring in a lot of violence, tensions, even a revolution.
