Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Explanation:
Modern Judicial institutions are established by government is a True statement
Explanation:
comparison microscopes are used to identify a specific weapon.
every gun weapon, has a unique pattern on the bullet after firing.
authorities can compare a murder weapon with the same stock of gun.
if murder weapon is found, they can compare the "murder bullet" with existing guns of the same make, model, if while finding the murder weapon, the same pattern exists on suspected weapon's bullet, it will be subjected as evidence.
Um well it is 2020 im not surprised but uh sure?
