Answer:
A. Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses
The First Amendment provides: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” These two clauses are referred to as the “establishment clause” and the “free exercise clause.” As with that part of the First Amendment which protects freedom of speech, both of these clauses have been applied to the states, and therefore operate against all levels of government in the United States. The free exercise clause protects the religious beliefs, and to a certain extent, the religious practices of all citizens. The more controversial establishment clause prohibits the government from endorsing, supporting, or becoming too involved in religion and religious activities.
Both clauses protect the same values, and often a violation of one would also be a violation of the other. For example, mandatory prayer in schools would constitute an improper establishment of religion and would also interfere with the free exercise rights of those students who did not believe in that particular prayer or prayer in general.
Explanation:
The architects of constitutions need to consider trade-offs as they empower the government to solve problems that require collective action.
- Undertaking collective action projects is not efficient when left in the hands of individuals. People tend to be individualistic in their aspirations and actions.
- Given this situation, however, meeting people's collective needs should not be detrimental to their welfare. And at the same, the latency to execute projects that will benefit all should be reduced by empowering governments to effect beneficial changes.
- Governments, on the other hand, always like to take on enormous responsibilities than they can handle. The architects must guard against <em>the government becoming too big and powerful </em>by controlling more resources than the citizens.
- Such a powerful government undermines the rights of individuals and uses its excesses to constrain individuals.
Thus, constitution framers should recognize the rights of individuals to manage their private lives against the excesses of the government.
Read more: brainly.com/question/17231840
Yes becayse you live there and get tooken care of
Code of Federal Regulations
Answer:
Law firms that file such lawsuits have a vested interest in assembling a large group of people to sue for damages.
-People who have suffered damages stand to gain compensation for those damages in class-action lawsuits.
-Deals between polluters and victims are harder to monitor and enforce than class-action lawsuits
Explanation:Class action lawsuits are lawsuits brought against an organisation or a person by a large number of persons who have suffered harm,hazard or losses as a result of the activities of that Organisation or that person. It can be as a result of pollution of the environment or other harmful Activities etc. Certain factors cause class action lawsuit to be more such as the following;
Deals between polluters and victims are very difficult to monitor or enforce than lawsuits.
Those who have suffered damage are likely to enjoy compensation with class action lawsuits than negotiation and some lawyers have special interest in such a case.