1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
V125BC [204]
3 years ago
15

Help!!

History
2 answers:
Gnoma [55]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The scientific revolution started on the year 1543 and ended on 1687! So yes the scientific revolution has ended.

Explanation:

<h2>However, the transformation occurring today still is very revolutionary in nature. While the scientific revolution represented a change in the human understanding of the world, the revolution today represents a physical change in how the world works. </h2>
lakkis [162]3 years ago
5 0
hdj bbsizbdksnkdbcs
You might be interested in
In the 1800s, european nations looked to control other countries in part to expand trade networks and establish global military
Amiraneli [1.4K]
This policy is known as COLONIZATION.
Colonization refers to the action of settling down among foreign indigenous people and establishing control over them. Politically, this action is usually carried out by powerful countries. The Europeans were able to colonize Africa, America and India.
7 0
3 years ago
What would be the right answer
Nadusha1986 [10]
What is the question?

3 0
3 years ago
3. Cuales fueron las caracteristicas sociales
AysviL [449]

Answer: I don't know your question

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Explique quais são os elementos que garantem que a teoria nazista foi um movimento de direita.
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

- Apoio de grupos conservadores e paramilitares

- Oposição e desprezo ao Marxismo

- Nacionalismo extremo

Explanation:

A teoria nazista foi um movimento de extrema direita que fica evidenciado pelo apoio de grupos conservadores e paramilitares da direita alemã além de  ter como uma de suas bases o desprezo e medo frente ao marxismo soviético e o nacionalismo extremo resultando inclusive em eugenia. Estes três elementos são típicos da extrema direita e explicitam o viés político do movimento nazista.

4 0
3 years ago
Help me explain please!!!!
hammer [34]
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, a little-discussed provision originally aimed at former Confederates. As relevant here, Section 3 says "no person" may "hold any office, civil or military, under the United States," who, "having previously taken an oath as…an officer of the United States…to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

Before we process, it important to state and describe what the First Amendment say.

The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The freedoms in the First Amendment include the freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

Citing the article of impeachment against the President Trump;

Inciting his followers to violently obstruct the congressional affirmation of President-elect Joe Biden's victory last Wednesday. President Trump's "prior efforts to subvert and obstruct the certification of the results of the 2020 Presidential election,"

Those actions, the article says, "threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperiled a coequal branch of Government." Trump "thereby betrayed his trust as President, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States."

Most of President Trump supporters who were arrested among those that stormed the United States Congress stated that they were urged by what President Trump said calling on his supporters who showed up in D.C. to protest Congress’s certification of the Electoral College and Biden’s victory. When addressing the demonstration during a speech, he encouraged people present to march toward the Capitol, during his rally on January 6th to storm the US Congress therefore President Trump is liable to the cause of the insurrection. Many of the rioters were found to have posted unfounded claims promoted by Trump that the election had been stolen or that widespread voter fraud contributed to President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

First, federal law makes it a crime to engage “in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof.” Someone who violates this statute faces a fine and up to 10 years in prison.

This law makes it a crime to incite such a rebellion, too, and violators “shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.” Thus, to the extent that a government official was complicit in Wednesday’s riot, they could potentially be stripped of their office.

Second, the law prohibits a “seditious conspiracy” to “overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States” or to “by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States.” Participants in such a conspiracy could face up to 20 years in prison.

Third, federal law provides that “whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States ... by force or violence” may face up to 20 years in prison, and may also be stripped of their ability to be employed by the federal government for up to five years.
Because this statute criminalizes speech, anyone charged under it would likely claim that prosecuting them violates the First Amendment. But the Supreme Court recognizes several exceptions to the First Amendment for things like incitement to imminent criminal acts or so-called “true threats.” So some of the insurrectionists might be convicted under this statute despite constitutional safeguards for free speech.

Finally, another statute makes it a crime to conspire “to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person ... in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” Thus, to the extent that members of Congress were exercising a “privilege” secured to them by the Constitution while they were disrupted by rioters, those rioters could potentially face criminal charges.
Violators of this statute face up to 10 years in prison.


7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of Locke's ideas were included by Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence? Choose one to discuss, including text from
    5·1 answer
  • He electoral college has many weaknesses. several reform plans have been suggested to strengthen these weaknesses. which plan wo
    7·1 answer
  • How did emperor Ashoka help spread Buddhism
    15·1 answer
  • Radical Republicans stated that Southern states had to in order to be readmitted into the Union.
    6·2 answers
  • Which most damage top soil and farming equipment during the 1930s?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did European countries believe that exploring other parts of the world would help them become more powerful?
    14·2 answers
  • The North’s control of railroads gave it an advantage during the Civil War because it could
    12·1 answer
  • What contributed to the development of of representative government in the American colonies?
    9·1 answer
  • How has the role of the federal government in social policy action changed since the onset of the great depression
    6·2 answers
  • Question 2
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!