1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna1 [17]
2 years ago
13

Why do the school districts of fast-growing cities, as well as towns with little industry, struggle to acquire enough local fund

ing to finance expansion?
History
1 answer:
Varvara68 [4.7K]2 years ago
4 0
A large proportion of local education funding is property taxes. It led to Texas becoming a leader in the aerospace industry.
You might be interested in
Which men were not on the presidential ballet of 1860?
Lesechka [4]
*Abraham Lincoln
(This was because the Republic Party did not exist in Louisiana)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
periodization is a useful concept to apply when: A .organizing Roman history into 3 main eras. B. distinguishing between primary
Softa [21]

The correct answer is A. Organizing Roman history into 3 main eras

Explanation:

Periodization in history refers to the process of studying and categorizing events of the past in to block of time. This process is aimed at facilitating the analysis of historical events and understanding the causes of specific historical processes.  Additionally, periodization is useful as blocks of time are organized according to relatively common characteristics. Considering periodization is applied when categorizing or organizing events of the past, it can be applied to Roman history which result could be 3 main eras with common historical features. Thus, periodization is useful in the case of organizing Roman History.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were Elon Musks actions in School
siniylev [52]

Answer:

In 1992, Musk left Canada to study business and physics at the University of Pennsylvania. He graduated with an undergraduate degree in economics and stayed for a second bachelor's degree in physics. After leaving Penn, Musk headed to Stanford University in California to pursue a PhD in energy physics

6 0
3 years ago
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
3 years ago
One of the “don’ts” in analyzing or evaluating a primary source is to avoid recreating the
Elanso [62]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

One of the “don’ts” in analyzing or evaluating a primary source is to avoid recreating the author’s experience of his society.

No, I don't agree with this statement because I consider that in order to truly understand the primary source, a good researcher has to understand the circumstance and the time in which the primary source was created.

This means, if it was during a war or a revolutionary period, the researcher has to understand and think as the author of the source did.

ANd I am clear using my words: understand. Not biasing the records, the facts, or misinterpret the situation, the context, or the facts.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1)Of the following statements which one is the most accurate regarding the political outcomes of the civil rights movement
    10·1 answer
  • Read the passage and answer the question.
    9·2 answers
  • What was the first phase of reconstruction? (this phase of reconstruction mwas between 1865-1867.)?
    7·2 answers
  • What role did the indians, mestizos, and ceroles play in mexico's independence from spain?
    10·1 answer
  • What czar turned Russia into a police state?
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the connection between the Boston Tea Party and the British East India Company. Include the Tea Act
    5·1 answer
  • Please answer the question in the picture. (11 points.)
    8·1 answer
  • A Big Year
    13·2 answers
  • The Iron Curtain was symbolic of:
    10·2 answers
  • In what year did the Western Roman Empire fall?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!