According to Aristotle, both tragedy and epic are forms of imitation. Tragedy imitates directly by means of mimesis and epic both directly and indirectly by means of mimesis and diegesis. While epic imitates solely by means of words, tragedy also imitates by means of spectacle. Both epic and tragedy portray people better or greater than the average spectator, unlike comedy which portrays people as worse than they actually are and uses humour to dissuade us from acting badly (Aristotle's lost treatise on comedy may be summarized in the Tractatus Coislinianus; see also Eco, The Name of the Rose for interesting view of Aristotle on comedy)
Due to practical constraints of production, tragedy ideally has a single unified action which is often restricted to a specific time and place. and a small n umber of characters, while epic has a broader scope of coverage.
Considering the available options for reasons that led to the revolutions in Latin America include the "<em><u>desire for greater political control."</u></em>
<h3>Latin America Revolution</h3>
The Latin American Revolution occurred between 1808 and 1826. During these periods, many Latin American colonies longed for greater political control of their territories.
<h3>Other reasons that led to the revolutions in Latin America include </h3>
- the desire for economic independence through trades
- inspiration of Enlightenment ideas influenced by US and French Revolutions'
- loss of Spanish strength due to wars with France, Britain, and later the United States
- Less ability for Spain to control colonies as there was lesser economic and political power to control the colonies
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>All of the Above</u> options.
Learn more about the Latin American Revolution here: brainly.com/question/11954278
Answer:
Good choices are:
Italy:
Mussolini seized power.
Ethiopia was invaded.
Supporters were called Blackshirts.
Japan:
Military leaders seized power.
All men over 20 were conscripted.
China was invaded.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: A.Smith knew that the invisible hand of the market was not concerned with the health of the laborer.
The power of invisible hand in the market only care about the power of supply and demand which would determine who will obtain the most wealth. Even if the process could disregard the wellness of many people, as long as the demand is met, consumers wouldn't put too much thought on the laborers.
