Answer:
A. anecdotal, because it tells a narrative about enslaved people taking action for basic human rights.
Explanation:
Passage:
<em>The seeds for this system were sown in 1823 in the sugar colony of British Guiana—now Guyana—where John Gladstone, father of the future British prime minister William Gladstone, owned over a thousand slaves. John Smith, a young and idealistic English preacher who had recently come to the area, was becoming popular with those slaves. His inspiring sermons retold the story of Moses leading the Jews out of Egypt and to freedom. The sugar workers listened and understood: Smith was speaking not about the Bible, but about the present. That summer, after hearing one of Smith’s sermons, over three thousand slaves grabbed their machetes, their long poles, and rose up against their masters. The governor of the colony rushed toward the burning plantations, where he met a group of armed slaves, and asked them what they wanted.</em>
<em />
<em>"Our rights," came the reply. Here was Haiti—and for that matter America and France—all over again. The slaves insisted they were not property; like the Jews in Egypt, they were God's children, who were owed their basic human rights.</em>
This is a narrative.
Answer:
1. To appeal to other countries that might be at war or foes of the United States of America. So, the United States and the other countries are the both sides.
2. The effect of this on the audience including those on the other side would be a softened emotion that would prompt them to strive for unity.
Explanation:
President John F. Kennedy on his inaugural day delivered a lecture to the American audience which was broadcast worldwide. In the middle of the speech, he started several sentences with the phrase, "Let both sides...". By referring to both sides, he was making reference to countries that were in opposition to the United States. He implored that they seek peaceful ways to resolve their problems instead of resorting to violence and the use of arms which were negative inventions of science.
This would have appealed to the emotions of his immediate and extended audience, helping them realize that war was not the best option for them. They would also come to see civility as a better way to deal with their issues.
Answer:
They would have harmed all of the animals and insects living within the forest,
and they would be brutally breaking their promise from before by making the deaths of the people who sacrificed their lives for the trees and animals look meaningless, and the king would be breaking his promise to the people by falsely telling them fake information
Because
This is the answer because cause and effect words are (because, if, therefore, since, then)