Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer: Technological
Explanation:
Technology is not a social responsibility and marketing citizenship. Whereas, Ethical, economic, legal and philanthropic all have their roles in social responsibility and marketing citizenship.
Answer:
A. American Revolution
Explanation:
In the United States, "Redcoat" is associated in cultural memory with the British soldiers who fought against the Patriots during the American Revolutionary War.
Answer:
Abraham Lincoln
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this survey President Abraham Lincoln was ranked as the greatest. Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president of the United States of America. He was born on February 12, 1809 in Kentucky, United States and is most notably known for leading the American Nation through their greatest moral and political crisis, which was the American Civil War.