Answer: B) Officer Martin may search the house in which the arrest occurred.
Explanation:
If the suspect is legally arrested, the police may search the suspect and the area in the immediate control and the entire place where the suspect was found during an arrest. No warrant is required to search the evidences. Also, the area must be legally seized so as to observed it again so that potential evidences can also be found after arrest.
The officer Martin who obtains an arrest warrant for Sam can conduct a search in Martin house without the search warrant. This is because the suspect is expected to have the tangible or destroyed evidences related to the case may be hidden in the Martin house.
they all include studying, either history or people, or nature. they all include observing something and studying it.
<span>The answer is preemption. The preemption doctrine raises to
the idea that a higher authority of law will move the law of a lower authority
of law when the two authorities come into conflict or encounter. When federal
and state law conflict, federal law shifts, or preempts, state law, due to
the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. U.S. Const. art. VI.,
§ 2. Preemption relates nevertheless of whether the conflicting laws come
from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions. For instance,
the Voting Rights Act, an
act of Congress, anticipates state constitutions, and FDA regulations may
preempt state court judgments in cases concerning prescription drugs.</span>
