Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency could be overturned through the subsequent Supreme ruling.
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency was a legal case in 2007. In this case, multiple cities and states including Massachusetts sued the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to force it to regulate the emission of pollutants.
Unexpectedly, EPA rejected the petition to control the emission of pollutants but the Supreme Court decided Massachusetts and the other petitioners had the right to sue EPA and that EPA needed to control the emission of pollutants including carbon dioxide.
This decision was quite controversial because 5 out of 9 justices approved it and many did not agree EPA had to control the emission of some pollutants. Because of this, the decision could be overturned through subsequent Supreme Court ruling that is the most common way to overturned previous decisions by the court that do not relate to the nation's fundamental law but specific laws.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1755400
hi howre you i dont know the answer
Answer:The first example deals primarily with CIVIL LIBERTIES.
while the second is more about CIVIL RIGHTS.
Explanation:
CIVIL LIBERTIES:
A citizen's rights to a freedom of speech without being restricted or autocratically manipulated by the government, for instance the right stipulated by the laws under the U.S. bill of rights .
CIVIL RIGHTS:
The right given to every person of every race, nationality , color ,gender , age ,religion or disability is referred to as the civil right, these are the rights stipulated by the law. An example is the right to equal protection under the law irrespective of any of the factors such as race , religion etc.
<span>One source of conflict are "personal" differences.
</span>
Indeed, we are generally extraordinary individuals, so it bodes well that we will all have contrasts, correct? Indeed, we are regularly attracted to other people who have some particular contrasts from us. The familiar maxim expresses that "opposites are drawn toward each other", which is regularly valid. The issue is that distinctions that draw us together can now and again turn into a wellspring of contradiction.
Answer:
What social inequalities are created by environmental racism?
Explanation: Trust me I'm big brain
